|
New 9/11 Truth Statement from
Daniel Sunjata
9/11
Blogger
Friday April 6, 2007
Daniel Sunjata, co-star of the critically-acclaimed FX Network
television series, Rescue
Me, spoke out today for 9/11 Truth. In a lengthy statement to
the PatriotsQuestion911.com
website, Sunjata offered his thoughts about how a small group
within our military and government could have been complicit in
the terrible events of 9/11.
Sunjata is a versatile actor who received a Tony Award
nomination for Best Actor for his starring role in the Broadway
play, Take Me Out. He appeared in Woody Allen's 2004 film, Melinda
and Melinda and in the 2006 movie The Devil Wears Prada with Meryl
Streep. He plays the starring role of Reggie Jackson in the upcoming
ESPN mini-series, The
Bronx is Burning.
Here's
Sunjata's statement (the rest of this post is Sunjata's direct
quote; note that the Patriots Question 9/11 web page will be updated
later tonight to include the quote):
I would like to respond to the question, "How could a small
group within our military and government have been complicit in
the terrible events of 9/11 without the entire government being
aware of it?"
My response is that the whole
government would not have to be in on the alleged conspiracy for
the following reason; our government is a hierarchy in which compartmentalization
of knowledge is a given. As suggested by the symbol of the pyramid,
the tier below does not necessarily know everything that the tier
above knows, and the tiers above that are privy to even more sensitive
and "classified" intelligence and so on. Even within common tiers
you see this compartmentalization where "the left hand knows not
what the right hand is doing."
Sounds dark and conspiratorial
but that's the fact. In fact it is the official excuse given by
the establishment for how such a thing as 9/11 could have happened
on their watch. It is therefore quite possible (even probable) that
an operation of this magnitude could be carried out without the
willful participation of the entire government.
For instance, the NORAD and FAA air-traffic controllers could
well have been ignorant of the alleged plot, yet innocently participated
in its being carried out. The commonly accepted stance of those
urging for a truly independent reinvestigation of 9/11, is that
it is a rogue faction within our government and military who hatched
and perpetrated this unholy atrocity through the agency of our ISI
funded assets like Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda (ISI is the Pakistani
version of our CIA, created and funded by our CIA). One strong piece
of evidence in this regard (albeit circumstantial, though one would
expect that FEMA, NIST and The 9/11 Commission would have probed
this with duly diligent scrutiny) is the fact that India's press
and subsequently the FBI both reported that Mohammed Atta had received
a $100,000.00 money transfer from the head of Pakistani ISI, Chief
Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmed, three days before the attack. Also General
Ahmed was in the U.S. from approximately Sept 9th to Sept. 13th
(DURING THE ATTACK) meeting with (among others) George J. Tenet,
the then CIA Director, and Porter Goss, the future Director of the
CIA.
Isn't it reasonable to subpoena General Ahmed and those he secretly
met with during the 9/11 attacks and question them under oath regarding
the substance of their discussions and the nature of their relationships?
Especially given the public record of ISI's dealings with and funding
of known terrorist organizations, one of which happens to be Al
Qaeda, and the revelation of the general's $100,000 "donation" just
before the murder of 2972 souls?
It is the avoidance of such obvious questions as these, of which
there are literally hundreds (most of them posed by The Family Steering
Committee during the 9/11 Commission's so called investigation)
which begs greater scrutiny of the official story. When a 7 year
old girl is found raped and dead in the cellar of her family home,
as painful and politically incorrect as it may be to question and
treat as suspects the parents who claim to have been sleeping soundly
during the rape and strangulation of their loved one...such protocols
are standard procedure in homicidal investigations. Shouldn't the
same protocols be followed in the case of domestic mass slaughter,
where a government who claims to have been asleep at the wheel during
the said atrocity is partially staffed and run by people who have
published a document outlining a 30 year plan for global economic
and military hegemony and "full spectrum dominance" characterized
by a permanent military presence in the middle east and cheap access
to that regions oil reserves? Especially when the same document
states that "this process of transformation is likely to be a long
and arduous one, absent some cataclysmic and catalyzing event like
A NEW PEARL HARBOR?"
Speaks to possible motive, no?
I say yes. What say you?
Here is a link to the documentary, 9/11:
Press For Truth, the first-person account of The Jersey
Girls [Kristen
Breitweiser, Patty
Casazza, Monica
Gabrielle, Mindy
Kleinberg, and Lorie
Van Auken] ; four widows who lobbied 441 days to get the Bush
administration to open an investigation into the events on (and
leading up to) 9/11. They helped spearhead The Family Steering Committee,
did years of research in the process, and felt that 70% of the burning
questions they had posed on behalf of the victim's families went
completely unanswered, since to address them would have lead the
Commission into "painful and politically incorrect" territory. Do
their words carry any weight, or are they just crazy conspiracy
theorists as well? You decide..."
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
