|
|
|
Media Subterfuge and School
Shootings
Curt Maynard
Politically
Correct Apostate
Tuesday April 17, 2007
Darn it, my wife is going to be angry with me again today. I’m
suppose to mow the lawn and do some work on the house, but some
crazy bastard went and murdered 32 people at Virginia Tech today
and the media is already fixated on utilizing this story as another
reason Americans should agree to reject the Second Amendment and
voluntarily disarm ourselves. I won’t get into my feelings about
these seemingly random school shootings we seen to hear about so
often anymore or who or what motivates them other than to say I’m
a bit skeptical that they are what the media presents them to be.
Why am I skeptical? Facts behind the Columbine shootings have absolutely
been covered up, there is no doubt, most of what we heard in the
media about Columbine was skewed in such a way as to suggest that
Klebold and Harris were neo-Nazis, when in fact the opposite was
true, Klebold was Jewish and he and Harris believed themselves to
be the persecuted victims of Nazi like thinking, i.e. they hated
Christians and sought to [and did] single them out for murder. Their
diaries clearly reveal this fact, but thanks to a judge named Lewis
T. Babcock, you’ll never hear about this, because he just ruled
a few days ago that facts
behind the Columbine shootings will be sealed for twenty years,
quite convenient timing given that this newest shooting followed
his ruling by less than two weeks [and nearly on the anniversary
of the Columbine shooting – within the same week in fact]. Trust
me, I guarantee you that this latest shooting too will have many
inconsistencies that the media will not tell you about. I can smell
these things any longer. The Columbine shooting was NOT what it
was portrayed to be by the media, there
were more than 100 witnesses whose testimony called into question
the “official story” of what happened that day in Littleton
Colorado, but many of you aren’t aware of this because the media
suppressed this information, something they can easily do, because
there are no longer any networks, newspapers, or news magazines
that are independent of Zionist control.
So on to the point of this article. We cannot trust the media to
tell us the truth, which means that we cannot trust what the media
will tell us about the latest shootings at Virginia Tech. The sad
fact of the matter is, we cannot trust the media period. I don’t
know about you, but it has come to the point for me, where if Fox
News reported that the sun rises in the East, I’d go outside to
confirm this for myself before I’d pass along this information to
anyone else.
As of right now, we do not know who the shooter was or who may have
killed him, or if he even intentionally shot himself. The reason
I bring this up, is that the media has played fast and lose with
important facts in the past so as to reinforce their primary agenda
which is to convince Americans that they should voluntarily disarm
themselves in the name of a better, safer society. Bernard Goldberg,
a major league Zionist propagandist spilled the beans on this in
his latest book “Arrogance”, which was essentially a worthless piece
of pro-Israel propaganda with the exception of this single important
story.
As described by a Rogers
University website:
“Goldberg analyzed media coverage of a school shooting that occurred
at the Appalachian School of Law in Grundy, Virginia.
According to Goldberg, what made this story newsworthy is that the
shooter in this event was subdued by several students who themselves
used guns to ‘overpower’ the gunman. Conducting his own Lexis-Nexis
search, Goldberg pronounced himself ‘stunned’ to discover that in
a search of one hundred news sources, “only a few papers in the
whole country reported the rescuers had guns” (p. 186). That many
newspapers then used this case to editorialize their opposition
to private ownership of handguns simply reaffirms Goldberg’s belief
that a liberal media embraces a reflexive anti-gun bias.”
No doubt this is true, which is reinforced by the following excerpt
from a CNN article entitled “Suspects
in Law School slaying arraigned”, which overtly neglects to
mention that those students that “tackled” the gunmen were themselves
armed with firearms, which undoubtedly made their job much easier:
“Students
apparently tackled the gunman, said Ellen Qualls, press secretary
for Virginia Gov. Mark Warner.”
Now I’ll bet anyone $100.00 today that you and I will never see,
not even once, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, or CBS, mention the fact
that armed students disarmed a shooter at the Appalachian School
of Law back in 2002 on [this is important] National Television.
You will NOT hear about this story because it does not support the
primary agenda the Zionist media which seeks to imbed into the forefront
of our thinking, i.e. that its better to give up our guns and live
in alleged safety than to insist that our Second Amendment rights
to gun ownership be respected by our treasonous government. The
reason for this is that the Zionist media and the traitors in our
government fear us; they fear us because we are a heavily armed
society and are becoming more and more aware of the stink emanating
from Washington DC. Hell, if I were these people, I’d be afraid
too.
The Zionist media also won’t tell you that Britain
and Australian crime rates have skyrocketed since they willingly
gave up their guns a few years ago, but nonetheless it’s true.
In an article I wrote some time ago entitled, “Don’t
let go of your guns,” I emphasized how important it is not to
fall for the medias lies, I wrote “now is not the time to even consider
giving up guns – now is the time to buy them, in large numbers,
in large calibers, for yourself, every member of your family, and
your neighbors. I meant it when I wrote it and I mean it even more
now.
As an aside, I’m watching Bush at this very moment on television
as he attempts to convince Americans that he’s “shocked” by what
took place at Virginia Tech today. The more enlightened reader might
ask; how it is that a man who actively participated in the murder
of some 3000 Americans on 9-11 could be “shocked” by the comparably
insignificant number of 32? Fox News has done its best for the last
few hours to convince us all that “Bush cares,” that he’s “horrified,”
and “shocked,” they’re doing their best to rehabilitate this wicked
man in the minds of Americans, but it won’t work the media’s time
is nearly at hand. Lastly, I strongly encourage the reader to become
immediately suspicious of any story they see or hear in the media
that is prefaced with the word “shocked,” no matter who or where
it is coming from, because this word has been so overused and abused,
that it’s real purpose is now more than apparent, to manipulate
and persuade.
At the very moment I’m posting this [April 16, 2007 @ 1519], Fox
News is interviewing a student named Kelly that saw with her own
eyes an Asian man being detained by police. After she said that,
Neil Cavuto immediately interjected and stated that police are reporting
that there was only one shooter and he was killed. So you see, the
story is already unraveling.
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
