|
Paulson's Fixit Plan for Wall
Street
MIKE WHITNEY
Counterpunch
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
It is being billed as a "massive shakeup
of US financial market regulation", but don't be deceived.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's proposals for broad market
reform are neither "timely" nor "thoughtful"
(Reuters) In fact, its all just more of the same free market "we
can police ourselves" mumbo jumbo that got us into this mess
in the first place. The real objective of Paulson's so called
reforms is to decapitate the SEC and increase the powers of the
Federal Reserve. Same wine, different bottle. Paulson's motive
is to preempt any regulatory sledgehammer that might descend on
the entire financial industry following the 2008 election. There's
growing fear that an incoming Democrat may tote a firehose down
to Wall Street.
If Paulson's plan is approved in its present form, Congress
will have even less control over the financial system than it
does now and the same group of self-serving banking mandarins
who created the biggest equity bubble in history will be able
to administer the markets however they choose without the inconvenience
of government supervision. That's exactly what Wall Street,
the Treasury Secretary and the folk at the Fed want; unlimited
power with no accountability.
Paulson is expected to lay out guidelines and principles that
are intended to help regulators supervise the financial markets.
According to AFP:
"The President's Working Group on Financial
Markets said the current regulatory structure is working well
despite calls by some US lawmakers."
(Article continues below)
In other words, the failing banking system, the housing meltdown,
and the frozen corporate bond market are all signs of a robust
financial system? This may be the most ludicrous statement since
"Mission accomplished". The system is imploding and
people are being hurt by the fallout. Thirty years of industry-led
lobbying has dismantled the (admittedly frail ad porous) regulatory
regime which made US financial markets the envy of the world.
Whatever credibility and transparency once existed were washed
out in the Clinton era, as with Glass-Steagall and government
oversight of the explosive growth of over-the counter derivatives
instruments. Now the system is prey to all types of dodgy debt
instruments, suspicious "dark pool" trading and off-balance
sheets operations which further reinforce the belief that cautious
investment is no better than casino gambling.
"The regulatory line of sight today is by the counterparties,"
the official said, adding that the guidelines should be "beneficial
to industry." (AFP)
How is that different than saying, "Caveat emptor"?
That's not a motto that inspires confidence. Many people still
naively believe that planning their retirement should not have
to be a Darwinian tussle with a crafty junk-bond salesman.
Under Paulson's plan, the Federal Reserve will be granted new
regulatory powers, but whatever for? The Fed doesn't use the
powers it has now. No one stopped the Fed from intervening in
the mortgage lending fiasco, or the ratings agency abuses or
the off-balance sheets shenanigans. They had the authority and
they should have used it. The folks at the Fed knew everything
that was going on---including the mushrooming sales of derivatives
contracts which soared from under $1 trillion in 2000 to over
$500 trillion in 2006---but they decided to cheerlead from the
sidelines rather than do their jobs. The fact is, they were
worried that if they got involved they might upset the gravy-train
of profits that was enriching their bankster friends.
Former Fed chief Greenspan used to croon like a smitten teenager
every time he was asked about subprime loans or adjustable rate
mortgages. And, as New York Times columnist Floyd Norris points
out, (Greenspan) "praised the growth in the derivatives
market as a boon for market stability, and resisted calls to
use the Fed's power to increase regulation." Of course,
he did. It was all part of Maestro's "New Economy";
trickle-down Elysium, where the endless flow of low interest
credit merged with financial innovation to create a Reaganesque
El Dorado. There are no regulations in this version of Eden,
not even "Don't bite the apple". Anything goes and
to heck with the public, they can fend for themselves.
Now its Paulson's job to keep the neoliberal flame lit long
enough to make sure that government busybodies and bureaucratic
do-goodies don't upset the cart. That means concocting a wacky
public relations campaign to convince the public that Wall Street
is not just a pirate's cove of land-sharks and bunko artists,
but a trusted ally in maintaining a strong economy through vital
and efficient markets.
The Times' Norris summed up Paulson's sham reforms like this:
"The plan has its genesis in a yearlong
effort to limiting Washington's role in the market. And that
DNA is unmistakably evident in the fine print. Although the
proposal would impose the first regulation of hedge funds and
private equity funds, that oversight would have a light touch,
enabling the government to do little beyond collecting information
- except in times of crisis. The regulatory umbrella created
in the 1930s would grow wider, with power concentrated in fewer
agencies. But that authority would be limited, doing virtually
nothing to regulate the many new financial products whose unwise
use has been a culprit in the current financial crisis. ("In
Treasury Plan, a Reluctant Eye over Wall Street", Floyd
Norris, New York Times)
What nonsense. The house is on fire and hyperventilating
Hank is still wasting our time with this rubbish. The real problem
is that Paulson and his buddies at the Federal Reserve think of
the financial system as their personal fiefdom so they refuse
to loosen their \ grip even though the economy is listing starboard
and the water is flooding into the lower decks.
Once again, the New York Times:
"All the checks and balances in the plan
reflect the mindset of its architect, Treasury Secretary Henry
Paulson, who came to Washington after a long career on Wall
Street. He has worried that any effort to substantially tighten
regulation could hamper the ability of American markets to compete
with foreign rivals."
No one elected Paulson to do anything. He has no mandate. He
is an industry rep. who has worked exclusively for a small group
of wealthy investors who have put the entire country at risk
with their toxic mortgage-backed bonds, their reckless Ponzi-type
speculation, and their off-book chicanery. Paulson should be
removed immediately and returned to his wolf's lair at G-Sax.
If Bush is serious about straightening out Wall Street, then
bring in Eliot Spitzer. He's probably available, at least in
daytime hours. And he'll do what it takes to clean house, that
is, put a truncheon-wielding robo-cop in every trading-pit at
the NYSE, and dispatch government accountants to every office
of every CFO making sure they have a Big Red Pen in one hand
and a taser in the other. That's the only way to get the attention
of the bandit-class.
"I do not believe it is fair or accurate to blame our
regulatory structure for the current turmoil," says Paulson.
Paulson is wrong. The current turmoil is all about the lack
of regulation and he'd better prepare himself for some big changes.
The pendulum is already in motion and tighter regulations will
soon follow. There needs to be an accounting process for all
transactions and capital requirements for every financial institution
that creates credit. No exceptions. All of these businesses
pose a real danger to the overall system and, therefore, must
conform to clearly articulated and strictly enforced rules;
no off-balance sheets operations, no dark pool trading, no unregulated
derivatives contracts, no level 3 assets, no "mark to model"
garbage bonds where CFOs unilaterally decide what they are worth
by picking a number out of a hat. Its time to restore order
to the markets so retirees and working class families can feel
safe investing in their futures. They are the ones who are most
hurt by Wall Street's endless trickery.
Paulson's plan is a non starter. The era of sandbagging, supply-side
banditry is over. Good riddance.
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
|