In an age in which life, itself, has become a perilous threat
to our well-being; in which the normally neurotic among us
demand collective security against every conceivable uncertainty
generated by either man or nature, we are slowly becoming
aware of what may prove to be the greatest peril ever to face
the planet. It is not "global warming," which is
a piddling threat when compared with this more menacing one.
The threat of which I write is one that has recently been
brought to our attention by astronomers and physicists. They
tell us that our galaxy – the Milky Way – is on
a collision course with another galaxy – Andromeda.
In a scant three billion years, these two galaxies will likely
merge to form a super-galaxy that has already been named:
Milkomeda. (I wonder if intelligent observers in Andromeda
might object to taking second-billing in this name. Perhaps
they would opt for "Andromeway" in the unlikelihood
of their having the same names that we employ for these galaxies.)
In any event, three billion years does give us a reasonable
amount of time to "do something" about this impending
danger. Government-funded research grants can be awarded to
academicians to help plan the systems and technologies necessary
to the collective effort that will be required. The politically-driven
– long accustomed to both generating and exploiting
widespread fear to the end of securing power over the lives
of their neighbors – will see in the upcoming "galaxy
crash" (how’s that for a catchy label?) as yet
another opportunity to terrify their fellow humans with the
unpredictable and inconstant nature of existence. Consistent
with their claims to omniscience in all matters, these "people-pushers"
will again promise to "find out what went wrong and fix
it, so that it doesn’t happen again!"
(Article continues below)
In case any of you are not aware of the gargantuan nature
of the task of "doing something" about this threat,
imagine a swirling galaxy the size of the room in which you
are sitting. Then imagine a pin-point located in the outer
reaches of that galaxy: that point is our solar system. Keeping
in mind that Earth is one of the smaller planets in this solar
system and, well, you can begin to grasp the scope of the
task before us. St. Al and his gaggle of self-styled "environmentalists"
have their priorities askew. To focus upon global warming
in the face of this greater threat is akin to regarding the
devastation of a worldwide nuclear war of lesser import than
the curse of infected hangnails!
How do we confront this great peril? To begin with, we must
demonize the approaching galaxy; to treat it as an invading
enemy, in much the same way we have learned to regard immigrants.
We humans are not only willing, but eager, to participate
in collective campaigns, but only if they are undertaken against
some "evil" force to be thought of as an "enemy."
Most of us love wars, and are prepared to mobilize against
anyone or anything that discommodes us. Our "wars"
on "poverty," "drugs," "discrimination,"
"cancer," "violence" (an interesting contradiction),
"obesity," "child abuse," "global
warming" – indeed, a war against anything but war
itself – reflect a propensity to regard life itself
as an enemy to be ferreted out and warred against. The unregulated
forces of the cosmos can be seen as another example of what
can happen when nature is left to its own devices, free of
political controls.
This is not the time to invoke the thinking of Einstein,
and regard the movements of Andromeda and Milky Way as "relative"
to one another. If our political leaders are to effectively
deal with this situation, Andromeda must be seen as attacking
"us." "We" will then be seen – by
"us" – as "victims" engaged in "galaxy
defense."
Creating such a mindset is the purpose of the mainstream
media. CNN and the other cable "news" channels can
begin providing reports on the impending "crash";
Lou Dobbs can offer his daily commentaries on the problems
that arise from allowing outsiders to cross our borders. The
gang at Faux News will remind us of the dangers of unregulated
travel, as well as the consequences of failing to build restraining
fences. Public opinion polls will be utilized to test whether
the prolonged conditioning in the unquestioned premises of
the campaign has been sufficient to convince Boobus of the
nature of the threat such that he/she will insist that the
government do what it had planned to do all along.
This struggle will demand the greatest sacrifices of us all.
No amount of money or authority siphoned off by our political
leaders can be thought of as too great. This is not some isolated
Star Wars threat, in which we must defend ourselves against
a giant "Death Star": we are menaced by an entire
galaxy, intent on "taking over" the whole damned
universe! Its plans have already been set in motion; its forces
approach in silence, as your beautiful children sleep peacefully
in their beds!
I have no doubt as to the willingness or the capacities of
corporate enterprises to mobilize on behalf of this enormous
defensive effort. Wars have taught us how eager so much of
the business community is to participate in "partnerships"
with the state when both are able to profit nicely from the
arrangement. World Wars I and II, the Cold War, and now the
War on Terror – along with its wholly-owned subsidiary
the Iraq War – not only confirm Randolph Bourne’s
observation that "war is the health of the state,"
but extends its beneficent effects to the corporate world.
Universities – ever on the prowl for government research
grants that can segue into opportunities for corporations
to cash in on developing and manufacturing technologies –
can help provide the scientific base for the upcoming galaxy
war. Astronomers will advise us that there are billions of
galaxies in the universe, each prepared to continue the onslaught
undertaken by Andromeda.
Given the spiraled nature of our galaxy, scientists may propose
that we do something to reverse its direction – a position
that the galaxy-hawk "hard-liners" may oppose as
a "cut-and-run" strategy. But assuming the re-orbiting
faction prevails, academia and the technocrats may soon be
offering blueprints for reversing the orbits of the planets
in our solar system. While we remain but a fly-speck in our
vast galactic setting, we must begin somewhere. After all,
if we humans can put men on the moon, reversing the orbits
of the likes of Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune involve nothing
more than a commitment of will.
Putting the galaxy in reverse gear will require a change
in our thinking. Political leaders can remind us to "ask
not what your galaxy can do for you, but what you can do for
your galaxy." T-shirts and bumper-stickers will abound
with such messages as "The Milky Way: Love It or Leave
It!" If the Milky Way spirals in a clockwise manner,
we must begin to think in counter-clockwise terms. Clocks,
themselves, will need to be redesigned to run in the opposite
direction to which we are accustomed. We must learn to walk
and drive backwards; to write – as some among us do
– from right to left; and to awaken at night, work through
evening and daylight hours, and go to sleep in the morning
hours. Those among us who resist such reversing policies will
be labeled "Andromedan terrorists" or "spies"
or "traitors."
Contrary to the assumptions in our current AlGorithmic thinking,
we may find ourselves having to produce even more highly-sophisticated
technologies that will generate even greater quantities of
carbon dioxide. The people-pushers – having admonished
us to sacrifice our interests in the name of saving the planet
– may now find themselves having to sacrifice their
ideological interests in the name of saving the galaxy!
The enemy will soon be upon us. A few billion years may sound
like an eternity to you, but this is not the time for dilatory
foot-dragging. If Andromeda can get away with this sneak attack
upon us, think of all the other galaxies – to be identified,
perhaps, as the "axies of evil"? – that might
be preparing their attacks. If we don’t stop them now,
we’ll have to stop them later.
The time to act is now! Do it for the children!