|
Evidence Suggests CIA Spiked
Investigations
www.UnansweredQuestions.org
Monday Aug 27, 2007
Dear Members of the Press:
A grave miscarriage of justice is afoot. After years being withheld
the Administration finally is forced to release the CIA's IG Report
on 9/11. While earlier news accounts said the report would be
released in early September it was released in the middle of a
Congressional recess, in the middle of a Summer break, thus insuring
it will not receive the attention it deserves. Worse still is
the conclusion in most press reports since its release that bolsters
the official narrative ie. that all the myriad failures were simply
due to 'systemic failure' and/or incompetence.
The circumstantial evidence running contrary to this conclusion
is compelling and convincing.
It appears that Al-Hazmi and Al-Mihdhar were being protected
by higher ups in the CIA. Respected author Joe Trento has reported
that they were working for Saudi Intelligence. Others reported
the two were removed from the watchlist two days before 9/11.
I don't know if either was the case. It is clear however that
there was a concerted effort to protect them similar in some respects
to the way authorities in FBI HQ refused to allow Rowley and company
in Minnesota to go into Mousaoui's laptop computer or how higher
ups prevented Robert Wright in Chicago from going after the money
trail of Yassin Al-Kadi (Qadi) who financed the software company
Ptech and the terrorist group Hamas and who was later named a
/Specially Designated Global Terrorist/ by President Bush in October
of 2001.
(Article continues below)
There is a pattern here that cannot be adequately explained by
charges of 'systemic failure' or incompetence. As Kristen Breitweiser
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kristen-breitweiser/enabling-danger-
par t-one_b_5951.html has suggested, something else is going
on, and the repeated missed opportunities (She has documented
7) and blocked communications suggests something "purposeful"
on the part of authorities. The IG Report says 60 agents reviewed
the Intel about the two.
Please review the statement below made by 9/11 widow Kristen
Breitweiser and by Investigative Journalist Michael Isikoff of
Newsweek. These are merely jumping off points to following a trail
few have had the courage to examine closely and relentlessly until
answers to the questions raised by Kristen and others are answered.
In the wake of 9/11, billions of dollars, the lives of soldiers
and the Constitution are being sacrificed. Let not truth be sacrificed
as well, not when it comes to what happened on September 11th,
2001.
Thank you.
Kyle F. Hence Co-Producer, 9/11: Press for Truth http://www.911pressfortruth.com
*Statement of Kristen Breitweiser, Co-Chairperson, September
11 Advocates Concerning the Joint 9/11 Inquiry Senate Select Committee
on Intelligence House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
September 18, 2002 * [snip] Perhaps even more disturbing is the
information regarding Khalid al-Midhar and Nawaf Alhazmi, two
of the hijackers. in late August, the CIA asked the INS to put
these two men on a watchlist because of their ties to the bombing
of the U.S.S. Cole. On August 23, 2001, the INS informed the CIA
that both men had already slipped into the country. Immediately
thereafter, the CIA asked the FBI to find al-Midhar and Alhazmi.
Not a seemingly hard task in light of the fact that one of them
was listed in the San Diego phone book, the other took out a bank
account in his own name, and finally, an FBI informant happened
to be their roommate. [snip]*
Later after three more years of connecting dots, Kristen Breitweiser
wrote in Huffington Post, August 20, 2005 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kristen-breitweiser/enabling-danger-
part -one_b_5951.html *
[snip] Additionally, when one carefully reads the 9/11 chronology
and information provided in the public record, it becomes increasingly
clear that the CIA´s repeated failure to share information with
the FBI about two of the 9/11 hijackers-al Mihdhar and al Hazmi--
was purposeful. There exists at least seven instances between
January 2000 and September 11th, 2001, that the CIA withheld vital
information from the FBI about these two hijackers who were inside
this country training for the attacks. Once, twice, maybe even
three times could be considered merely careless oversights. But
at least seven documented times? To me, that suggests something
else. (To read about these instances, I suggest you read 9/11
materials relating to the "watchlisting issue" involving al Mihdhar
and al Hazmi which is a story so detailed, that it deserves its
own lengthy blog.) [snip]
*From an interview with Newsweek Investigative Reporter Michael
Isikoff for the documentary, 9/11: Press for Truth http://www.911pressfortruth.com :*
MICHAEL ISIKOFF: The CIA learned about this meeting. It arranged
for it to be under surveillance by the Malaysian special branch...
The CIA subsequently learned within days that... Almihdhar and
Alhazmi were headed for the United States. ...An FBI detailee
who knew about this at the Counter Terrorism Center of the CIA
drafted a cable to alert the FBI, and that cable was quashed by
superiors at the CIA.
***************
STANDARD DISCLAIMER FROM UQ.ORG: UnansweredQuestions.org
does not necessarily endorse the views expressed in the above
article. We present this in the interests of research -for the
relevant information we believe it contains. We hope that the
reader finds in it inspiration to work with us further, in helping
to build bridges between our various investigative communities,
towards a greater, common understanding of the unanswered questions
which now lie before us.
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
|
