|
Are Polls Deliberately Falsified
or Just Not Accurate
John Perna
JBS
Saturday December 8, 2007
Recent polls that, by and large, are being reported
as accurate and reliable are actually skewed in favor of certain
candidates at the expense of others.
Follow this link to the original source: "Audio
Poll Done by IMC Polling (Independent Media Center of New Hampshire)"
The link above is to an audio poll conducted by IMC Polling —
Independent Media Center of New Hampshire. The computer generated
recording asks you if the primary were in your area today, which
Republican candidate would you vote for, and it was followed by
instructions to press "1" for McCain, "2"
for Giuliani, "3" for Fred Thompson, "4" for
Mitt Romney, "5" for Mike Huckabee, "6” for
"other or none of the above," and "7" to have
your name taken off the call list. That was it. No more options.
Other similar polls are being used in other states as well.
Two people who received the phone poll today responded differently:
one pressed "7," and was thanked by an automated voice
assuring them that they will not be called again. The other pressed
"6" and also was thanked by an automated voice telling
them they would be removed from the list.
(Article continues below)
If you take the time to visit IMCs website, in the far left column
you will see Ron Paul listed along with all the other candidates,
allowing you to vote for Ron Paul or any of the other candidates
on their website. You can also view the results which are very
enlightening. As this was written (Dec. 6), Ron Paul was leading
by an astounding margin. He had 84.2 percent, with Dennis Kucinich
next at 6.6 percent, followed by Barack Obama at 2.1 percent.
Even with the blackout in the phone poll, Ron Paul is wiping the
floor with the rest of them.
In the interest of fairness, in order for any poll to be accurate
and credible no candidate can be excluded. It is very intriguing,
therefore, to see Ron Paul leading such polls even when the phone
component of the poll ignores him completely. The mainstream media
have made much of this, complaining that Ron Paul supporters are
"hacking the polls." If the media were interested in
reporting the real story, they would note that the fact Ron Paul
seems always to win by a landslide in these polls is likely indicative
of the organizational strength of his campaign — a measure
that traditionally has been used to judge the viability of a candidate.
In light of this, perhaps it is time for the media to start considering
Paul one of the frontrunners.
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
|
