Statement at Hearing of the House Financial Services Committee,
February 15, 2007
Transparency in monetary policy is a goal we should all support.
I've often wondered why Congress so willingly has given up its
prerogative over monetary policy. Astonishingly, Congress in essence
has ceded total control over the value of our money to a secretive
central bank.
Congress created the Federal Reserve, yet it had no constitutional
authority to do so. We forget that those powers not explicitly
granted to Congress by the Constitution are inherently denied
to Congress – and thus the authority to establish a central
bank never was given. Of course Jefferson and Hamilton had that
debate early on, a debate seemingly settled in 1913.
But transparency and oversight are something else, and they're
worth considering. Congress, although not by law, essentially
has given up all its oversight responsibility over the Federal
Reserve. There are no true audits, and Congress knows nothing
of the conversations, plans, and actions taken in concert with
other central banks. We get less and less information regarding
the money supply each year, especially now that M3 is no longer
reported.
The role the Fed plays in the President's secretive Working Group
on Financial Markets goes unnoticed by members of Congress. The
Federal Reserve shows no willingness to inform Congress voluntarily
about how often the Working Group meets, what actions it takes
that affect the financial markets, or why it takes those actions.
But these actions, directed by the Federal Reserve, alter the
purchasing power of our money. And that purchasing power is always
reduced. The dollar today is worth only four cents compared to
the dollar in 1913, when the Federal Reserve started. This has
profound consequences for our economy and our political stability.
All paper currencies are vulnerable to collapse, and history is
replete with examples of great suffering caused by such collapses,
especially to a nation's poor and middle class. This leads to
political turmoil.
Even before a currency collapse occurs, the damage done by a
fiat system is significant. Our monetary system insidiously transfers
wealth from the poor and middle class to the privileged rich.
Wages never keep up with the profits of Wall Street and the banks,
thus sowing the seeds of class discontent. When economic trouble
hits, free markets and free trade often are blamed, while the
harmful effects of a fiat monetary system are ignored. We deceive
ourselves that all is well with the economy, and ignore the fundamental
flaws that are a source of growing discontent among those who
have not shared in the abundance of recent years.
Few understand that our consumption and apparent wealth is dependent
on a current account deficit of $800 billion per year. This deficit
shows that much of our prosperity is based on borrowing rather
than a true increase in production. Statistics show year after
year that our productive manufacturing jobs continue to go overseas.
This phenomenon is not seen as a consequence of the international
fiat monetary system, where the United States government benefits
as the issuer of the world's reserve currency.
Government officials consistently claim that inflation is in
check at barely 2%, but middle class Americans know that their
purchasing power – especially when it comes to housing,
energy, medical care, and school tuition – is shrinking
much faster than 2% each year.
Even if prices were held in check, in spite of our monetary inflation,
concentrating on CPI distracts from the real issue. We must address
the important consequences of Fed manipulation of interest rates.
When interests rates are artificially low, below market rates,
insidious mal-investment and excessive indebtedness inevitably
bring about the economic downturn that everyone dreads.
We look at GDP numbers to reassure ourselves that all is well,
yet a growing number of Americans still do not enjoy the higher
standard of living that monetary inflation brings to the privileged
few. Those few have access to the newly created money first, before
its value is diluted.
For example: Before the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system,
CEO income was about 30 times the average worker's pay. Today,
it's closer to 500 times. It's hard to explain this simply by
market forces and increases in productivity. One Wall Street firm
last year gave out bonuses totaling $16.5 billion. There's little
evidence that this represents free market capitalism.
In 2006 dollars, the minimum wage was $9.50 before the 1971 breakdown
of Bretton Woods. Today that dollar is worth $5.15. Congress congratulates
itself for raising the minimum wage by mandate, but in reality
it has lowered the minimum wage by allowing the Fed to devalue
the dollar. We must consider how the growing inequalities created
by our monetary system will lead to social discord.
GDP purportedly is now growing at 3.5%, and everyone seems pleased.
What we fail to understand is how much government entitlement
spending contributes to the increase in the GDP. Rebuilding infrastructure
destroyed by hurricanes, which simply gets us back to even, is
considered part of GDP growth. Wall Street profits and salaries,
pumped up by the Fed's increase in money, also contribute to GDP
statistical growth. Just buying military weapons that contribute
nothing to the well being of our citizens, sending money down
a rat hole, contributes to GDP growth! Simple price increases
caused by Fed monetary inflation contribute to nominal GDP growth.
None of these factors represent any kind of real increases in
economic output. So we should not carelessly cite misleading GDP
figures which don't truly reflect what is happening in the economy.
Bogus GDP figures explain in part why so many people are feeling
squeezed despite our supposedly booming economy.
But since our fiat dollar system is not going away anytime soon,
it would benefit Congress and the American people to bring more
transparency to how and why Fed monetary policy functions.
For starters, the Federal Reserve should:
How can a policy of steadily debasing our currency
be defended morally, knowing what harm it causes to those who still
believe in saving money and assuming responsibility for themselves
in their retirement years? Is it any wonder we are a nation of debtors
rather than savers?