On February 26, 1993, a gray snowy day in Manhattan like the
one I write on 14 years later, the FBI and US government failed
to stop the van-bomb explosion in the World Trade Center’s
basement garage, just as NORAD and the US government failed to
stop the airliner blitz on the Twin Towers and Pentagon on September
11, 2001.
I remember crowds fleeing from the Towers in ’93, choking
with smoke, exhaustion, and disbelief. But as James Bovard points
out in FBI Blunders and the First World Trade Center Bombing,
events that led to that infamy started years earlier.
On November 5, 1990, Rabbi Meir Kahane was giving a predictably
anti-Arab speech at a New York hotel. Kahane had founded the radical
Jewish Defense League (JDL), which passionately preached expelling
all Arabs from Israel and the “occupied territories”
by force. The Knesset, Israel’s Parliament, actually banned
Kahane’s political party for “inciting racism”
and “endangering security,” which indeed it was doing.
To make matters worse, as Kahane finished his speech on that
night, El Sayyid Nosair, a 36-year old Egyptiam immigrant, walked
up to Kahane, pulled out a .357 and shot him to death in the neck.
Nosair belonged to a group of Muslims that avowedly hated Israel
and the Egyptian government of Hosni Mubarak. When police searched
Nosair’s residence, they walked off with 47 boxes of documents
such as paramilitary manuals, maps, diagrams of buildings (including
the World Trade Center).
Yet as the September 2002 congressional Report on Federal Failures
Before 9/11 stated, “The NYPD and the District Attorney’s
office resisted attempts to label the Kahane assassination a ‘conspiracy’
despite the apparent links to a broader network of radicals. Instead,
these organizations reportedly wanted the appearance of speedy
justice and a quick resolution to a volatile situation. By arresting
Nosair, they felt they had accomplished both.”
Thus, the “lone gunman” trial of Nosair, starting
in late 1991, brought crowds of angry Muslim supporters outside
the courthouse, death threats agains the judge and lawyers, cries
for ‘blood’ revenge against Nosair, and shouts of
‘Death to Jews!’ A small band of Muslims circled the
sidewalks each day in front of the courthouse, trashing Israel,
the US, supposed persecution of Nosair. As observed in a July
4, 1993, Los Angeles Times article, N.Y. Trial in Rabbi’s
Death Planted an Explosive Seed, “Out of those loud demonstrations
of contempt for the US judicial system would emerge what authorities
now say was a clandestine cell of ‘“terrorists”
[quotation marks mine] who conspired to set off the World Trade
Center bomb blast, plotted an unparalleled wave of attacks on
US landmarks and political figures and shattered America’s
image of invulnerability to terrorism.” That is, with a
little help from their friends.
Enter FBI informant Emad Salem
The FBI put an informant named Emad Salem, a 43-year old former
Egyptian military officer, smack dab in the middle of the Muslim
protestors. Salem worked the group and became bodyguard for the
blind Sheik Abdul Rahman, radical Muslim cleric and group leader.
The sheik, coincidentally, had been heavily subsidized by the
U S government while in Pakistan in the late 1980s, helping to
pump up Muslims to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan, sort of a
sheik for all seasons and reasons.
Though the evidence that Nosair killed Kahane was damning, the
jury somehow found him not guilty for murder but guilty on a firearms
charge, i.e., possessing the murder weapon. Work on that one.
And Salem, after the trial, continued to work the “terrorist”
room as an FBI informant, receiving $500 a week plus expenses.
Right after Nosair was convicted, Salem met regularly with other
members of the “cell,” “cadre,” “conspiracy”
-- hard-line Muslims who banded together during the Kahane trial.
As a result, in 1992, Salem warned the FBI repeatedly that the
group was planning to pull off a catastrophic bombing in New York
City. But the FBI, in its own strange wisdom, was convinced Nosair
was making up tall tales and canned him. Work on that one.
Presenting the first World Trade Center bombing
When on February 26, 1993, a 1,200-pound bomb in a van exploded
in the parking garage under the World Trade Center, purportedly
in a government agency parking spot; it was the most destructive
terrorist attack on US soil to that time. Its achievement is now
supplanted by the 9/11/01 attack. What’s next, a whole city,
a region, a blue state?
That dark question aside, the ’93 attack killed six people,
injured more than a thousand, and racked up a half billion dollars
in damage. It is said that if the van had been parked a few feet
closer to one of the pillars, it could have collapsed at least
one of the towers onto the other, thereby collapsing both and
killing tens of thousands.
But note how the event is clearly an underground explosion. Explosions
from under, within, and on top of the Towers that led to their
pulverization would be disguised in the 2001 hits as effects of
the plane hits and subsequent fires that melted building frames
and caused their nine to 10-second, speed-of-gravity free falls.
See 911Mysteries and LooseChange for details on how well those
infamous hoaxes have been dispelled.
The ’93 case, like the 2001 case, was quickly cracked.
Mohammad Salameh, one of the alleged bombers, had repeatedly gone
to the Ryder rental office in Jersey City and demanded that Ryder
refund his $400 deposit for the van, which he claimed to be stolen.
Why didn’t he just confess and ask to be arrested? You remember
Mohammed Atta conveniently left a suitcase, in a Maine airport,
full of documents in Arabic, maps, plans to destroy buildings,
along with wills of fellow conspirators. Also, Atta’s passport
miraculously surfaced from the smoldering debris at Ground Zero,
shouting look at me, look at me.
Of course back in ’93, ‘law enforcement’ agents
had already figured out from fragments at the WTC that the van
was the bomb delivery vehicle. Salameh was shuffled off to jail
and the FBI quickly snared other plotters. Similarly, the FBI
identified almost immediately after the 9/11 hits the 19 Muslim
perpertrators and declared that planes were the sole instruments
of death. In the first case, Time magazine in all its wisdom,
announced that the FBI “looked supremely capable in speedily
rounding up suspects in the World Trade Center bombing.”
Hurrah, and let’s get back to those basketball and football
games.
Assistant US Attorney Andrew McCarthy boasted to a New York jury
that the first World Trade Center attack was one of the FBI’s
finest hours: “To the rest of the world out there, [the]
explosion in all its tragedy was actually a high-water mark for
the FBI.” And the New York Times told us that FBI agents
had been monitoring two mosques in the New York City area, as
well as Sheik Omar Abdul Rahman, although . . .”Federal
guidelines had limited their ability to tail them or conduct other
close surveillance. Nothing suggesting the purchase of explosives
or the assembling of a bomb was detected, the officials said.
Even close surveillance might not have picked up a surreptitious
act, they said.”
A few months later, FBI director William Sessions said, “Based
on what was known to us at the time, we have no reason to believe
we could have prevented the bombing of the World Trade Center.”
Are these guys kidding or they kidding? They had Emad Salem on
the inside in 1992, a year before, warning them a catastrophe
was cooking, and they canned him.
The secret tape recordings
After the bombing, the FBI further played Keystone Cops and stumbled
over themselves to rehire Salem, offering him a million bucks
to discover evidence of more terrorist plots. Salem, being a reasonably
smart guy, did not trust the boyz to pay up. So he secretly recorded
his conversations with FBI agents. In August, as the case approached
its trial, news leaked Salem had made tapes of more than a hundred
hours of his conversations with FBI agents and handlers. Yet somehow
the transcripts were not helpful to the prosecution.
In a call to an FBI agent shortly after the bombing Salem complained,
“We was start already building the bomb, which is went off
in the World Trade Center. It was built, uh, uh, uh, supervising,
supervision from the Bureau [FBI] and the DA [district attorney]
and we was all informed about it. And we know that the bomb start
to be built. By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful
great case. And then he ‘the FBI [supervisor]’ put
his head in the sand and said, o no, no, no that’s not true,
he is a son of a bitch, okay.”
Not elegant rhetoric, but we get the point. The FBI is playing
Salem and he is fully aware of it.
Frustrated, Salem told one FBI agent, “You were informed.
Everything is ready. The day and the time. Book. Lock them up
and that’s that. That’s why I feel so bad.”
Another tape revealed Salem asking an FBI agent, “Do you
deny your supervisor is the main reason of bombing the World Trade
Center?” The agent did not deny Salem’s charge. Shortly
after the bombing, FBI agent Nancy Floyd confided to Salem that
her supervisions botched the case: “I felt that the people
on the squad, that they didn’t have a clue of how to operate
things. That the supervisors didn’t know what was going
on. That they hadn’t taken the time to learn the history.”
Purportedly, it was never totally clear to what degree Salem
instigated the bombing, in contrast to just reporting on the plot
to his FBI controllers. Yet, as James Bovard reports, Salem offered
to do a switcheroo on the bombers and substitute harmless powder
for deadly explosives and prevent any real catastrophe. The FBI
turned down his offer. Why? Salem wasn’t committed to explosives.
Why were they?
Salem groused to one FBI man that an FBI supervisor “requested
to make me to testify [in public] and if he didn’t push
for that, we’ll be going building the bomb with a phony
powder and grabbing the people who was involve in it. But . .
. we didn’t do that.”
That’s right, the real explosives were used and the reason
lands square in the FBI’s lap.
The FBI was also embarrassed by the 47 boxes of explosive plans
and information that had been seized from Nosair and left sitting
in storage for two years. In fact, the FBI claimed that part of
the reason for that was that no one in the New York FBI office
spoke or read Arabic. Like no one, not even a UN interpreter who
could be borrowed, or a scholar from one of the many universities
in town?
One note on one of the boxes read, “We had to thoroughly
demoralize the enemies of God. This is to be done by means of
destroying and blowing up the towers that constitute the pillars
of their civilization, such as the tourist attractions they’re
so proud of and the high buildings they’re so proud of.”
In fact, a law enforcement official told the Los Angeles Times
in 1993 that the materials “described major conspiracies
and provided a road map to the bombing of the World Trade Center
and the subsequent plot.” All that rhetoric and no response?
FBI, shame on you again.
Bottom line: more praise than heads rolling
Somehow the FBI got more credit for “solving” the
first World Trade Center bombing than it got “blame”
for the fact that its informant may have aided in the bombing,
or that they paid no heed to his warning. In the wake of what
may be interpreted as sheer incompetence, purposeful negligence
or dare I say veiled participation, Congress held no oversight
hearings or investigations of how and why the feds goofed. Instead,
in the wake of the first WTC devastation, the FBI rode the wave
with its new director, Louis Freeh.
The 2002 congressional Report into pre-9/11 failures said, “The
first attack on the World Trade Center was an unambiguous indication
that a new form of terrorism -- motivated by religious fanaticism
and seeking mass casualties -- was emerging and focused on America
. . . However, the strategic implications of this shift in lethality
do not appear to have been fully recognized.”
It’s ironic that this non-recognition or “system-failure”
worked in 1993 as a no-blame explanation. Somehow it became the
effective excuse for 2001’s tragedy: “massive system
failure.”
Worse, could it be that what was really emerging was a pattern
of false flag attacks on the US, going forward to the Oklahoma
City bombings of the Murrah Building on April 19, 1995? That bloody
catastrophe was supposedly caused by a Ryder Truck containing
an ANFO bomb, driven there by two lone gunmen, Timothy McVeigh,
executed for it by lethal injection June 11, 2001, and Terry Nichols
later jailed for life for it. As of November 8, 2006, Nichols
was still trying to blow the whistle on the FBI’s involvement
in it and being denied access to reporters.
Also, first responders that awful day found two other live bombs
and the remains of an exploded bomb. The live bombs were at each
end of the building and subsequently removed and defused. The
exploded bomb in the middle of the building was the one that caused
the major damage and murder. The ANFO truck-bomb blow-up was basically
a ruse.
In fact, witnesses had noticed, earlier in that week, several
men in jumpsuits with “Government Agency Personnel”
written on the back, working on wiring in the basement garage
of the Murrah building. Thus, there seems to be government (FBI)
involvement and subsequent cover-ups in all three domestic tragedies,
and with “terrorist” patsies of one kind or another
to take the raps.
So, when we look back on November 26, 1993, April 19, 1995, or
September 11, /2001, let us also look forward to what our “internal
terrorists” have planned next and what the basis of their
ruthlessness and fanaticism is. Perhaps simply money and power.
If we don’t learn the lessons of history and correct how
we deal with these events soon, we will see them repeated.
We should also look back to the classic false flag Operation
Northwoods, which was designed to make it look like Cuba was attacking
the US, so that the US would attack Cuba and remove Castro. JFK
may have lost his life, in part, for stopping the operation cold
and firing its author, the chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
General Lyman Lemnitzer, in September 1962.
Yet, once those same forces found a green light for Kennedy’s
assassination in 1963, larger and more frequent false-flag attacks
on and off US soil could follow. This to make sure that a populace
cowed by fear of some external “ism” would keep fighting
it to the death. Tragically, the corrosive enemy was a cancer
killing from within for its own hungry agenda. And so, a belated
conscious WTC anniversary to all. And dare I say “never
forget?” all the facts or perps.