Across this last weekend, the Western propaganda machine was
working overtime, celebrating the latest NATO miracle: the transformation
of Serbian Kosovo into Albanian Kosova. A shameless land grab
by the United States, which used the Kosovo problem to install
an enormous military base (Camp Bondsteel) on other people's
strategically located land, is transformed by the power of the
media into an edifying legend of "national liberation".
For the unhappy few who know the complicated truth about Kosovo,
the words of Aldous Huxley seem most appropriate: "You
shall know the truth, and the truth shall drive you mad."
Concerning Kosovo, truth is like letters written in the sand
as the tsunami of propaganda comes thundering in. The truth
is available--for instance in George Szamuely's thoroughly informative
piece last Friday here on CounterPunch. Fragments of the truth
sometimes even show up in the mainstream media, mostly in letters
from readers. But hopeless as it is to try to turn back the
tide of officially endorsed legend, let me examine just one
drop in this unstoppable sea of propaganda: a column by Roger
Cohen entitled "Europe's new state", published in
the Valentine's Day edition of the International Herald Tribune.
(Article continues below)
Cohen's op ed piece is fairly typical in the dismissive way
it deals with Milosevic, Russia and the Serbs. Cohen writes:
"Slobodan Milosevic, the late dictator, set Serbia's murderous
nationalist tide in motion on April 24, 1987, when he went to
Kosovo to declare that Serbian 'ancestors would be defiled'
if ethnic Albanians had their way."
I don't know where Roger Cohen got that quotation, but it is
not to be found in the speech Milosevic made that day in Kosovo.
And certainly, Milosevic did not go to Kosovo to declare any
such thing, but to consult with local Communist League officials
in the town of Kosovo Polje about the province's serious economic
and social problems. Aside from the province's chronic poverty,
unemployment, and mismanagement of development funds contributed
from the rest of Yugoslavia, the main social problem was the
constant exodus of Serb and Montenegrin inhabitants under pressure
from ethnic Albanians. At the time, this problem was reported
in leading Western media.
For instance, as early as July 12, 1982, Marvine Howe reported
to the New York Times that Serbs were leaving Kosovo by the
tens of thousands because of discrimination and intimidation
on the part of the ethnic Albanian majority:
This was in fact the first instance of "ethnic cleansing"
in post-World War II Yugoslavia, as reported in The New York
Times and other Western media, and the victims were the Serbs.
The cult of "memory" has become a contemporary religion,
but some memories are more equal than others. In the 1990s,
the New York Times evidently forgot completely what it had said
about Kosovo in the 1980s. Why? Perhaps because meanwhile, the
Soviet bloc had collapsed and the unity of independent, non-aligned
Yugoslavia was no longer in the strategic interest of the United
States.
Back to Milosevic in Kosovo Polje on April 24, 1987. An incident
occurred when local police (under an Albanian-dominated Communist
League government) attacked Serbs who had gathered to protest
lack of legal protection. Milosevic famously told them, spontaneously:
"No one should beat you any more!" If this is "extreme
nationalism", perhaps there should be more of it.
But nowhere do I find a trace of the statement attributed to
Milosevic by Cohen. In his speech to local party delegates that
followed, which is on the public record, Milosevic referred
to the "regrettable incident" and promised an investigation.
He went on to stress that "we should not allow the misfortunes
of people to be exploited by nationalists, whom every honest
person must combat. We must not divide people between Serbs
and Albanians, but rather we should separate, on the one hand,
decent people who struggle for brotherhood, unity and ethnic
equality, and, on the other hand, counter-revolutionaries and
nationalists."
I turn again to Aldous Huxley for comfort: "Facts do not
cease to exist because they are ignored."
But Huxley also said: "Great is truth, but still greater,
from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. By simply
not mentioning certain subjects... totalitarian propagandists
have influenced opinion much more effectively than they could
have by the most eloquent denunciations."
Last Tuesday in Geneva, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov
tried to convey to journalists his grave concern about the way
the United States was handling the Kosovo problem.
"We are speaking here about the subversion of all the
foundations and principles of international law, which have
been won and established as a basis of Europe's existence at
huge effort, and at the cost of pain, sacrifice and bloodletting,"
he said.
"Nobody can offer a clear plan of action in the case of
a chain reaction [of further declarations of unilateral independence].
It turns out that they [the United States and its NATO allies]
are planning to act in a hit or miss fashion on an issue of
paramount importance. This is simply inadmissible and irresponsible,"
the Russian diplomat said. "I sincerely fail to comprehend
the principles guiding our American colleagues, and those Europeans
who have taken up this position," he added.
Roger Cohen dismisses such considerations in five words: "the
Russian bear will growl". Russia, he adds, "will scream.
But it's backed the wrong horse." There are no issues here,
no principles. Just growling and gambling. "Milosevic rolled
the dice of genocidal nationalism and lost", says Cohen.
This is not only a false statement, it is a grotesquely meaningless
metaphor. Milosevic tried to suppress an armed secessionist
movement, secretly but effectively supported by neighboring
Albania, the United States and Germany, which deliberately provoked
repression by murdering both Serbs and Albanians loyal to the
government. Like the Americans in similar circumstances, Milosevic
relied too heavily on military superiority rather than on political
skill. But even the NATO-sponsored International Criminal Tribunal
for Former Yugoslavia in The Hague had to abandon any charges
of "genocide" against Milosevic in Kosovo. For the
simple reason that there was never a shred of evidence for such
a charge.
Milosevic is no longer alive, and Russia is far away. But what
about the Serbs who still live in the historic part of Serbia
called Kosovo? Cohen takes care of that problem in a few words:
"Some of the 120,000 Serbs in Kosovo may hit the road."
As Aldous Huxley pointed out, "The propagandist's purpose
is to make one set of people forget that certain other sets
of people are human."
Then you can tell them to "hit the road".
The "Unique" Case
Russia has warned that Kosovo independence will set a dangerous
precedent, encouraging other ethnic minorities to follow the
example of the Albanians and demand secession and an independent
State. The United States has dismissed such concerns by flatly
asserting that Kosovo is "unique". Well yes, Kosovo
is a unique case, and is the only one recognized by the United
States until the next "unique case" comes along. When
legal criteria have been thrown out, we just have one "unique
case" after another.
The "uniqueness" claimed by the United States is
a propaganda construction. It is based on the supposed "uniqueness"
of Milosevic's repression of the armed secessionist movement,
which was not unique at all. It was standard operating procedure
throughout history and the world over, in such circumstances.
Deplorable, no doubt, but not unique. It was minor indeed compared
to the similar but endless and far bloodier anti-insurgency
operations in Colombia, Sri Lanka, and Chechnya, not to mention
Northern Ireland, Thailand, the Philippines And unlike the counter-insurgency
operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, which kill incomparably
more civilians, it was carried out by the legal, democratically
elected government of the country, rather than by a foreign
power.
The propaganda "uniqueness" is an abstraction. Like
every place on earth, Kosovo is indeed unique. But in ways that
have nothing to do with the U.S. pretext for taking it over
and turning it into a military outpost of empire.
To know how a place is unique, you have to be interested in
it.
I have not visited Kosovo since before the 1999 NATO war. On
one occasion, in August 1997, I drove around the province in
a failing Skoda, at my own expense, just looking. Driving in
Kosovo was a bit risky, partly because of the number of dead
dogs in the road, and mostly because of local drivers' habit
of passing slower vehicles on hills and curves. In northern
Kosovo, just outside the town of Zubin Potok, this habit produced
one of its inevitable consequences: a head-on collision with
serious casualties, which shut down the two-lane highway for
hours while ambulances and police sorted things out.
Unable to proceed toward Pristina, I drove back to Zubin Potok
to pass the time on the shaded terrace of a roadside restaurant.
I was the only customer, and the lone waiter, a tall, handsome
young man named Milomir, gladly accepted my invitation to sit
down at my table and chat as I sipped glass after glass of delicious
strawberry juice.
Milomir was happy to talk to someone familiar with the French
city of Metz, which he had visited as a student and remembered
fondly. He loved to read and travel, but in 1991 he got married
and now had two small daughters to support. Job prospects were
poor, even though he had been to university, so he had no choice
but to stay in Zubin Potok. As for Europe, even if he could
get a visa (impossible for Serbs anyway), he spoke no language
more Western than his mother tongue, Serbo-Croatian. He had
studied Russian (he loved the literature) and Albanian as his
foreign languages. He learned Albanian in order to be able to
communicate with the majority in Kosovo.
But such communication was difficult. Milomir was very much
in favor of a bilingual society, and thought everyone in Kosovo
should learn both Serbian and Albanian, but unfortunately this
was not the case. The younger generation of Albanians refused
to speak Serbian and learned English instead.
The town of Zubin Potok was located near the dam on the Ibar
River built in the late 1970s to create hydraulic power. Coming
from Novi Pazar, I had driven along the 35-kilometer-long artificial
lake created by the dam, looking in vain for a nice place to
stop. It seemed that there must have been villages along the
Ibar River before the dam was built, and I asked Milomir about
this. Yes, he said, the artificial lake had flooded a score
of old villages, of ethnically mixed, but mostly Serb population.
The Albanian Communist authorities in Pristina had resettled
the Serbs outside of Kosovo, around the town of Kraljevo. There
were about 10,000 of them.
This was a minor example of the administrative measures taken
to decrease the Serb population during the period, before Milosevic,
when Albanians were running the province through the local Communist
League.
Milomir was not complaining, but simply answering my questions.
He did not go too often (by bus--he had no car) to the nearest
large city, Mitrovica, because he was afraid of being beaten
by Albanians. This was just a fact of life, at a time when (according
to Western media) Albanians in Kosovo were being terrorized
by Serbian repression.
While we were chatting, a friend of his came along and the
conversation turned to politics. There was a presidential campaign
underway. The two young men wanted to know which candidate I
thought would be best for Serbia in the eyes of the world. Milomir
was tending toward Vuk Draskovic, and his friend was for Vojislav
Kostunica. Neither would dream of voting for either Milosevic
or Seselj, the nationalist leader of the Radical Party.
Zubin Potok Today
I have no idea what has become of Milomir, his wife, his two
daughters, or his friend. Zubin Potok is the western-most municipality
in the heavily Serb-populated north of Kosovo. From the internet
I learn that the population of Zubin Potok municipality (including
surrounding villages) has nearly doubled since I passed through.
It now comes to approximately 14,900, including about 3,000
internally displaced Serbs (from other areas of Kosovo where
the Albanian majority has driven them out), 220 Serbian refugees
from Croatia and 800 Albanians. The local assembly is overwhelmingly
dominated by Kostunica's Democratic Party of Serbia, but includes
two Kosovo Albanian representatives.
Up until now, schools, hospitals, and other public services,
as well as the local economy, have continued to function thanks
mainly to subsidies from Belgrade. The Albanian declaration
of Kosovo independence will create a crisis by demanding an
end to such vital subsidies--which, however, an "independent
Kosovo" is unable to replace. Moreover, bands of Albanian
nationalists are declaring that Zubin Potok "is Albanian"
and must be "liberated from the Serbs". They can be
seen on You Tube, using the Statue of Liberty as their symbol,
and threatening Serbs in Albanian rap.
The European Union is moving in to provide law and order. But
the "order" they claim to be protecting is the one
defined by the Albanian nationalists. What does that mean to
people like Milomir and his little family?
For Roger Cohen, the answer is easy: "hit the road!"
Serbia, by the way, already has the largest number of refugees
in Europe, victims of "ethnic cleansing" in Croatia
and Kosovo. And Serbs cannot get visas or refugee status in
Western Europe. They have been labeled the "bad guys".
Only their enemies can be "victims".
Before and After
Kosovo before the NATO war and occupation was, nevertheless,
a multiethnic society. The accusation of "apartheid"
was simply Albanian propaganda, as the Albanian nationalist
leaders chose to use that heavily-charged term to describe their
own boycott of Serbs and Serb institutions. Every police action
against an Albanian, for whatever reason, whether for suspicion
of armed rebellion or for ordinary crime, was described as a
"human rights violation" by the Albanian human rights
network financed by the United States government.
It was an extraordinary situation that the Serbian and Yugoslav
governments allowed an illegal separatist "government of
Kosovo", headed by Ibrahim Rugova, to hold shop in the
center of Pristina, regularly receiving foreign journalists
and regaling them with tales of how oppressed they were by the
horrid Serbs.
But the laws were the same for all citizens, there were Albanians
in local government and in the police, and if there were cases
of police brutality (in what country are there no cases of police
brutality?), the Albanians at least had nothing to fear from
their Serb neighbors.
Even then, it was the Serbs who were afraid of the Albanians.
Only outside Kosovo could anyone seriously believe that it was
the Albanians who were under threat of "ethnic cleansing"
(much less "genocide"). Such a project was simply,
obviously, out of the question. It was the Serbs who were afraid,
who spoke of sending their children to safety if they had the
means, or who spoke bravely of remaining "no matter what".
Later, in March 1999, when NATO began to bomb Kosovo, Albanians
fled by the hundreds of thousands, and their temporary flight
from the war theater was presented as the justification for
the bombing that caused it. The press did not bother to report
on the Serbs and others who also fled the bombing at that time.
In Kosovo, in 1987, in Pristina and Pec, I observed a peculiar
sort of group behavior that reminds me only of school playgrounds
in Maryland in my childhood. A gang of kids get together and
by various signs, body language, and a minimum of words, convey
to some outsiders that they are excluded and despised. I have
seen Albanians act in this way toward stray Serbs, especially
old women. This variety of "mobbing" was not violent
in 1987, but turned so after NATO occupied the territory. It
was encouraged by the official NATO stamp of approval of Albanian
hatred for Serbs, delivered by bombs in the spring of 1999.
Of course, there must have been Serbs who hated Albanians.
But in my limited, chance experience, what struck me was the
absence of hatred for Albanians among Serbs I met. Fear, yes,
but not hatred. A great deal of perplexity. Sister Fotina at
the Gracanica monastery had a very Christian explanation. We
tried to help the Albanians care for their many children, she
said, and yet they turn against us. This must be God's way of
punishing us for turning away from Christianity during the time
of Communism, she concluded. She blamed her fellow Serbs more
than the Albanians.
The divine punishment has not been confined to Christians,
however. In the southernmost corner of Kosovo live an ancient
population called Gorani (meaning mountain people), who converted
to Islam under the Ottoman Empire, like most of the Albanians.
But their language is Serbian, and this is unacceptable to the
Albanians. Estimates vary, but it is agreed that at least two
thirds of the Gorani have left since NATO "liberation".
Pressure and intimidation have taken various forms. Albanians
have moved into the temporarily vacant homes of Gorani who went
to Austria and Germany to earn money for their retirement. The
NATO-protected Albanian authorities have found ways to deprive
Gorani children of schooling in the Serbian language. In the
main Gorani town of Dragash, an Albanian mob attacked the health
center and caused health workers to flee. Then, last January
5, a powerful explosion destroyed the bank in Dragash. It was
the only Serbian bank still allowed to operate in the south
of Kosovo, and served mainly to transfer the pensions that allowed
local Gorani to survive.
As usual, the crime went unpunished.
David Binder, who used to report on Yugoslavia for the New
York Times, before he was excluded for knowing too much, reported
last November * on a long investigation of conditions in Kosovo
commissioned by the German Bundeswehr. The existence of this
report is proof that the Western governments, while publicly
claiming that Kosovo is "ready for independence",
know quite well that this is not true. Among other things, Binder
reports: