If the Balkans had an anthem, it would be that 1950's doo-wop
hit, "Fools rush in, where angels fear to tread."
The latest Balkan fools are the United States and the European
Union, which have rushed in to recognize what Serbian Prime
Minister Vojislav Kostunica rightly calls the "fake state
of Kosovo." Why is it a fake state? Because there are
no Kosovars, only Serbs and Albanians. Each group seeks to
unite Kosovo with its homeland, historic Serbia or Greater
Albania. An independent Kosovo has the half-life of a sub-atomic
particle.
The action of the U.S. and the E.U. in stripping Serbia of
Serbs' historic homeland is both a crime and a blunder. It
is a crime, first, because no one, not even the U.N., has
a legal right to dismember a sovereign state, and second,
because the narrative used to justify the illegal action is
a lie. The stated justification is that the Serbs, under Slobodan
Milosevic, were ethnically cleansing Kosovo of Albanians.
As German courts have established, there was no ethnic cleansing
of Albanians in Kosovo until NATO started bombing Serbia.
After NATO launched its unprovoked attack on Serbia (Mrs.
Albright's splendid little war), the Serbs dumped the Albanians
on NATO's doorstep as a vast logistics spunge. That wasn't
terribly nice, but when you are a very small country fighting
all of NATO, you do what you can. Ironically, after Serbia
was forced to capitulate when Russia withdrew her support,
NATO blithely presided over the ethnic cleansing of two-thirds
of Kosovo's Serbs by the Albanians.
(Article continues below)
In international affairs, blunders are worse than crimes,
and two of the blunders contained in the recognition of Kosovo
are likely to have consequences. The first is the creation
of an irredenta, which guarantees another Balkan war. Serbia
will never accept the wholesale alienation of one of her provinces.
Like France after 1871, her whole policy will focus on recovering
her lost territory as soon as the moment is ripe.
The second blunder is further alienating Russia, this time
in a way she cannot ignore. If the U.S. and the E.U. are blind
to the ghost of 1914, Russia and Serbia are not. The fact
that Russia went to war to protect Serbia then puts pressure
on Moscow to do so again, lest the Putin government look weak
domestically as well as abroad.
Washington and Brussels scoff at the thought, but Russia
and Serbia certainly have military options. A guerrilla war
against European and American troops and police in Serb-inhabited
portions of Kosovo is likely to occur spontaneously, at least
at a low level. IEDs and sniper ambushes are easy enough to
arrange. Belgrade can ramp it up by smuggling in shaped-charge
anti-armor mines, dual-warhead RPGs and sniper rifles, along
with Serbian special forces to make sure they are used effectively.
If Europe responds with economic measures against Serbia,
Russia now has enough petro-dollars to support Belgrade economically.
If NATO threatens a new bombing campaign, Russia can up the
ante too by sending Russian air defense troops and equipment
to Serbia. The last time NATO bombed Serbia, Russia was too
weak to respond. That is not true now, nor is President Putin
for sale the way Mr. Yeltsin was.
The last thing the world needs now is a new Balkan war, with
NATO and Russia caught in a contest of mutual escalation.
Is there a way to walk this dog back? I think there is, if
Washington and Brussels regain some sense of reality. They
can do what Bismarck did in 1878 and call a conference. There,
a solution could be negotiated that all parties might live
with, even if none really liked it. One such solution would
be to partition Kosovo between Serbia and Albania, with Serbia
compensated for her loss of some of Kosovo by being allowed
to annex the Serbian portion of Bosnia. The fact that both
Kosovo and Bosnia are fake states would make such a deal all
the easier. As the E.U. has already discovered, maintaining
fake states is an expensive and never-ending business.
Fools rush in, but sometimes even fools are wise enough to
back out again. Berlin, are you listening? The Congress of
Berlin of 2008 may be as successful as the Congress of Berlin
of 1878 in averting war in Europe.