|
Infowars Exclusive: 7/7 Bus Bomb
Survivor Describes "Agents" At Scene In Immediate Aftermath
Witness claims a group of secret service operatives
and intelligence officers were already inside the cordon before
the bus arrived in Tavistock square.
Steve Watson & Alex Jones
Infowars.net
Monday, January 29, 2007
Daniel Obachike, the man who was on the lower deck of the number
thirty bus that exploded in Tavistock Square in London on 7/7/05,
has exclusively provided Infowars with a preview of a new section
of his soon to be published narrative, The
4th Bomb.
Last month we detailed
how Daniel's forthcoming book will claim that the Hackney bus was
diverted to Tavistock Square by two unmarked cars which then left
the scene at high speed after the drivers had conversed with police
in the area.
"Standing by the doors I see a blue BMW 5
series and black Mercedes squeal to a halt in front of the bus,
halting its progress along Euston Road. 4 minutes passed then a
police motorcyclist arrived at the blockage. The BMW driver said
something to the cyclist who soon sped off. 90 seconds later the
BMW suddenly drives off. The Mercedes waits till the bus diverts
east into Upper Woburn Place towards Tavistock Square before it
speeds away."
Daniel claims that in the immediate seconds after
the blast, a man dressed all in black was filming him with a hand
held camera. He claims he was subjected to a program of surveillance
and harassment for months by the police and was only asked to provide
a witness statement 6 months after the event.
In a section entitled The Angels And Agents Of
Tavistock Square, Daniel details what and who he saw in the
immediate aftermath of the explosion, including claims that operatives
were pre positioned inside the square, ready to deal with the immediate
aftermath.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to start your own blog or website, get the word out and support
Alex Jones? Infowars.net offers
high-quality webhosting services at very competitive prices, and
most importantly, with
infowars.net, privacy is paramount! We don't sell the names of our
customers to marketing
firms or the government. Click
here for more info.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
He says that amidst the chaos, he witnessed individuals
calmly observing the events and activities, without any signs of
grief or shock, as if they had "assigned tasks". Daniel
states that these individuals proceeded "busily, workman like
almost as if they’d already displayed their grief and horror
prior to the explosion'.
On his website he provides the following four images
of an injured man whom he says was at least 45 metres ahead of the
bus, despite the fact that images show the blast blew backwards.
Indeed,
the image further below shows that even people that were on the
bus, at the front, were not killed or badly injured. So Daniel asks
the question how is it that a man 45 metres in front of the bus
was subject to blast injuries?
It is possible that the man walked or ran away from
the bus after the explosion, however, Daniel notes that he did not
have a speck of victims blood on him, while others close to the
blast were "showered".
Daniel says that he remembers seeing both the bandage
around the man's head, and a neat tear in his trouser leg within
60 seconds of the explosion and claims that this person was some
kind of intelligence operative that was quickly whisked away after
the bomb had gone off.
When Daniel was finally asked to make a statement,
police questioned him for 4 hours, a clip of the interview is on
his website. They asked him to him mark points where he thought
people were on a diagram of the bus layout that was totally wrong,
which he believed would render his statement inadmissible.
He claims he was then followed around by the same
three operatives from Enfield Town Police Station, North London,
for the following six months, saying that the surveillance was more
overt than covert, they were letting him know that he was being
watched 24-7.
Clearly neither the claim of unmarked dark cars, nor operatives
in the area can be verified, they are just that, claims. We merely
report them here as a matter of public interest. They also serve
as the testimony of a first hand witness to the bus blast.
There are many more facts surrounding the events of
7/7 that have been verified and put the official narrative in severe
doubt, showing that, at the very least, a public inquiry is needed.
Check the London
Bombings data page for further research.
Here now is the section of Daniel Obachike's narrative
as provided to Infowars:
The Angels And Agents Of Tavistock Square
by Daniel Obachike
That morning many good human values immediately
came to the fore, amidst evil in one of its purest forms.
I’d hurriedly left the death strewn by the
blast in my wake but was befuddled by what I saw ahead of me. I
stopped, turned round and was even more dumbfounded by what I saw.
Strangely I found myself drawn back to the scene
of the crime and meandering between the angels and agents in Tavistock
Square headed back towards the bus.
The angels I refer to were the healthcare professionals and
staff that were quickly on hand in such shocking circumstances,
trying to do whatever they could despite initially being aghast
at the dead pieces of human flesh and bodies littering the square.
The agents on the other hand were conspicuous by the way they
diligently adhered to their assigned tasks, proceeding busily, workman
like almost as if they’d already displayed their grief and
horror prior to the explosion.
Apart from the obvious foot soldiers, (the blokes in blue)
there were one or two more covert ones that stuck in my mind for
differing reasons.
Their cover was blown, not because of what they did, but because
of what they didn’t do. Faced with such an unprecedented and
horrendous event most reactions would come down to fight or flight.
After my own flight and initial rage at all things and persons
Transport For London (Bus drivers in particular), I turned to comfort
a shocked victim showered with blood who had been walking alongside
the bus at the time of the explosion. Those few who did neither
were notable. They stood back, observing the events and activities
in its entirety, positioned in the same spot.
The man with the hat was one such individual but his case is
particularly intriguing when compared to the plain intelligence
officers and foot soldiers I referred to.
I was going to make a point of highlighting him in my forthcoming
novel: The 4th Bomb, but editorial considerations meant his 15 minutes
is surplus to requirement.
My editor felt that whilst interesting the section on him ‘acted
as a diversion’ to the storyline.
The irony is, a part of me thinks that is what he was doing there
that morning.
I present compelling evidence that the smartly dressed man
in grey was fully aware of what was about to take place and was
prepared to be part of the aftermath but got caught out because
the bus blew up just a couple of meters into Tavistock Square while
he was positioned 60 meters away further down from the blast.
Images show the main force of the blast went backwards and
one victim, a woman died because she crossed the road from the square
behind the bus at the time of the explosion.
So how can anyone 60 meters ahead of the bus to be hurled aside
or sustain any kind of physical injuries. I knew his injuries were
improvised, immediately putting 2 and 2 together when I saw his
hat lying on the ground next to him.
e wore a large bandage around his head and had a tear along
one trouser leg that went neatly along the seam. The bandage 60
seconds after the blast. This was way too fast, long before any
medical assistance had arrived.
The blood on my own shirt is derived from a woman who was showered
with the victim’s blood. She had been walking beside the bus
at the time. The grey suited man had no blood on him at whatsoever
indicating he was far from the bus.
Even the African traffic warden on the opposite side of the
road who the driver called out to said he had a piece of human flesh
on his arm.
We may never know his true purpose that day. But what it does
do is single him out as someone who had prior knowledge. Who knew
in advance? Only the perpetrators?
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
Email
