|
NASA Scientist Predicts
CO2 Bottom Line for the Planet
Ann Shibler
JBS
Friday January 4, 2008
James Hansen, the mainstream media’s favorite proponent
of global warming is at it again. This time he insists that
350 parts per million carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is
the absolute limit and anything over that will be quite catastrophic.
Follow this link to the original source: "Remember
This: 350 Parts Per Million"
NASA scientist James Hansen pontificated at a San Francisco
academic conclave on global warming recently that the new
bottom line for carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 350 parts
per million. "The evidence indicates we've aimed too
high — that the safe upper limit for atmospheric CO2
is no more than 350 ppm," he said after his presentation.
Hansen said the Earth is already at 383 parts per million,
so, by his estimate we’ve gone too far. His solution
is to go cold turkey from coal, gas, and oil use immediately.
To achieve this he would ban all new coal-fired power plants,
phase out old coal-fired generators, and a place a tax on
carbon so high that tar sands and oil shale will be left in
the ground forever. Americans, of course, would be left sitting
in cold, dark houses if this came to fruition. Naturally,
he proposes his recipe for economic disaster for the United
States, but not for China — a nation he says should
be allowed to continue to build and operate coal-fired power
plants. Like radical leftists generally, he would have U.S.
citizens collectively fall on their swords so that so-called
developing nations can raise their standard of living.
(Article continues below)
Interestingly, this is the same James Hansen whose NASA team
seriously fudged some numbers recently that made global warming
seem much worse than it really is. He had listed 1998 as the
hottest year on record, when in fact it was 1934. The "error"
has been corrected, but it was done quietly, oh so very quietly.
And isn’t this the same James Hansen who received $720,000
from George Soros, the master manipulator of public opinion,
in order to push the global warming agenda via the mass media?
He also received a $250,000 award from the Heinz Foundation.
Interesting.
Even his colleagues are beginning to distance themselves
from Hansen and his rantings. NASA administrator Michael Griffin
disagrees with Hansen’s rash attempts to limit CO2 emissions
via his self-created 350 ppm limit theory, saying:
To assume that it is a problem is to assume that the state
of Earth’s climate today is the optimal climate, the
best climate that we could have or ever have had and that
we need to take steps to make sure that it doesn’t
change. I guess I would ask which human beings where and
when are to be accorded the privilege of deciding that this
particular climate that we have right here today, right
now is the best climate for all other human beings. I think
that’s a rather arrogant position for people to take.
Hundreds of climate scientists and meteorologists disagree
with Hansen’s conclusions and recommendations. In particular,
David Whitehouse, a BBC correspondent says "the global
temperature of 2007 is statistically the same as 2006 as well
as every year since 2001." He believes global warming
may be ending.
Perhaps James Hansen’s credibility will finally be
doubted with this latest hysteria. And maybe the tide is turning
and 2007 will be looked upon as the year the whole man-made
global-warming theory started to crumble. We look forward
to its final demise. We look to the future for better and
sound science, without political agendas as the driving force.
What a relief that would be!
|
INFOWARS: BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
|
