Ron Paul is the Johnny Cash of American politics. For decades,
nobody in Nashville disputed that Cash was the genuine article,
but by the early 1990s he was forgotten by a music industry
more concerned with newcomers like Garth Brooks and Travis
Tritt. Later Cash went on to resurrect his career on his own
terms, and while remaining country to the core, he attracted
a diverse audience, many of whom didn't even identify with
country music.
The same could be said of Congressman Ron Paul. Since 1976,
nobody in Washington D.C. denied that the Texas Republican
was the genuine article, but by 2007 he was laughed off by
a political industry more concerned with "serious contenders"
like Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani. Paul forged ahead on his
own terms, and while remaining conservative to the core, he
has attracted a diverse audience, many of whom have never
identified with the Republican Party.
But what does Ron Paul stand for? In a word — change.
Yes, the most overused word in the 2008 presidential campaign
applies to no one better than the Texas Republican, whose
10-term congressional career has been spent in virtual solitude
for refusing to sell out his principles for politics.
(Article continues below)
The Republican Party has drifted so far from bedrock, conservative
principles, as outlined above, that Paul is in the unique
situation of being a breath of fresh air for traditional conservatives
as well as independents, liberals, and scores of young people
for whom "left" and "right" mean very
little. Most Americans have literally never seen a candidate
quite like him.
Candidates like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton or Mike
Huckabee and Mitt Romney are charismatic, understand the political
machine, and use it to their advantage. Paul is an entirely
different animal. While the other candidates are scheming
and strategizing, Paul simply explains his policies and answers
questions honestly, giving no thought as to how mouthing certain
buzzwords might boost his chances. Says The Atlantic's Andrew
Sullivan, Paul is "the real thing in a world of fakes
and frauds." And even though Paul himself is fond of
saying that his message is perfect even if the messenger is
not, his genuineness has given him major appeal. Like Cash,
"keepin' it real" has perhaps been Paul's best asset.
The irony of politics is that the people typically least
involved have the most to lose — young people. Older
voters, no doubt, vote with patriotic intentions, but simple
logic tells us that those who have contributed to the system
the longest will always vote for candidates who promise to
give them the best return on their investment, however much
voters groan about getting ripped off. The establishment candidates
of both parties love big government, if for no other reason
than it's a great way to manipulate voters each election.
Full
article here.