Royal Society, an organisation made up of renowned eco-fascists
and depopulation fanatics, is to launch a major study on human
population growth and its implications for social and economic
development, a study it has ludicrously branded "objective".
"The society acknowledges it is delving into a hugely
controversial area, but says a comprehensive and scientific
review of the evidence is needed." reports the BBC,
along with a picture of a huge crowd of people crammed together
(which is actually a rock concert of some kind).
"This is a topic that has gone to and fro in the last
few decades, and appears to be moving back up the political
agenda now," said the leader of the study Sir John Sulston.
"So it seems a good moment for the Royal Society to launch
a study that looks objectively (emphasis mine)
at the scientific basis for changes in population, for the different
regional and cultural factors that may affect that, and at the
effects that population changes will have on our future in term
of sustainable development."
The manifestly obvious problem with this study, as anyone who
knows anything about the Royal Society will note, is the fact
that leading members of the group are obsessed with pushing
a depopulation agenda.
The Royal Society is a 350 year old establishment outfit that
has recently thrown its full weight behind the global warming
movement, lending its absolute support for legislation aimed
at reducing carbon emissions by 80%, a process that will devastate
the global economy and drastically reduce living standards everywhere.
The society has been even more vehement than national governments
in its advocacy of the man-made cause of global warming, calling
for such drastic CO2 cuts to be made in the short term, not
even by the usual target date of 2050.
As the BBC notes in their report, one of the members of the
Royal Society's working group for this population study is Jonathon
Porritt. Porritt is the former chair of the UK Sustainable Development
Commission, one of former Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s
leading green advisers, who has stated that Britain's
population must be cut in half from around 60 million
to 30 million if it is to build a sustainable society.
Porritt is also a member of The
Optimum Population Trust (OPT), a notorious UK-based
public policy group that campaigns for a gradual decline in
the global human population to what it sees as a "sustainable"
OPT article on today's news opens with the line,
"The human population is far higher than any other primate
at any time in history". This outlines exactly where these
people will approach the study from.
Another notable member of both the OPT and The Royal Society
is Futurist and top Eco-Fascist James Lovelock.
a patron of the OPT in 2009. In a statement released
by the trust to mark the appointment, Lovelock called on the
environmental movement as a whole to "recognise the truth
and speak out" on the link between rising human numbers
and global warming.
Lovelock said: "Those who fail to see that population
growth and climate change are two sides of the same coin are
either ignorant or hiding from the truth. These two huge environmental
problems are inseparable and to discuss one while ignoring the
other is irrational."
He added: "How can we possibly decrease carbon emissions
and land use while the number of emitters and the space they
occupy remorselessly increases? When will the environmentalists
who claim to be green recognise the truth and speak out?"
Lovelock also recently called
for the ending of freedom in order that an overriding
global power made up of "a few people with authority"
can oversee the radical stemming of the planet's human population
in order to combat climate change.
So you begin to see how laughable it is to expect the Royal
Society's global population study, which will certainly be used
as a reference by other leading institutions and global bodies,
to be in any way "objective".
The OPT and The Royal Society also boast, as a patron, BBC
darling wildlife broadcaster and film-maker Sir David Attenborough,
who has called
for a one child policy like that of Communist China
to be implemented in Britain. The proposal is one of the OPT's
main initiatives.Attenborough is also on theRoyal
Society's working group for this population study.
Again, is this man's influence going to result in an "objective"
study on population?
Another member of the working group is Cambridge economist Sir
Partha Dasgupta, also a fellow of the OPT.
Malcolm Potts, another member of the working group
was the first male doctor at the Marie Stopes Abortion Clinic
in London, he also advised on the UK's 1967 Abortion Act.
Stopes, an anti-Semite Nazi sympathizer, campaigned for selective
breeding to achieve racial purity, a passion she shared with
Adolf Hitler in adoring letters and poems that she sent the
leader of the Third Reich.
Stopes also attended the Nazi congress on population science
in Berlin in 1935, while calling for the “compulsory sterilization
of the diseased, drunkards, or simply those of bad character.”
Stopes acted on her appalling theories by concentrating her
abortion clinics in poor areas so as to reduce the birth rate
of the lower classes.
Stopes left most of her estate to the Eugenics Society, an
organization that shared her passion for racial purity and still
exists today under the new name The
Galton Institute. The society has included members
such as Charles Galton Darwin (grandson of the evolutionist),
Julian Huxley and Margaret Sanger.
Perhaps most notably, the head of the Royal Society's new study,
John Sulston, most famously played a leading role in the Human
Genome Project, the effort to identify and map
the thousands of genes of the human genome. Sulston worked under
James D. Watson, a notorious eugenicist who has previously argued
that black people are inherently less intelligent than whites
and has advocated the creation of a "super-race" of
humans, where the attractive and physically strong are genetically
manufactured under laboratory conditions. Watson is also affiliated
with the Royal Society, indeed, in 1993 he recieved the society's
Copley Medal of honour for "outstanding achievements in
research in any branch of science, and alternates between the
physical sciences and the biological sciences".
Sulston is also a leading advocate of the renowned Atheist
group, The British Humanist Association.
It is clear that this organisation and these people are immersed
in the science of eugenics, and that they have continued the
science under the guise of environmentalism. They hate humanity
and any notion that their population study will represent anything
other than an establishment avocation of mass depopulation is
It is imperative that the media, places of education, government
representatives and the wider public are made aware of these
Alex Jones' film End Game explains why the elite are obsessed
with pushing eugenics and bizarre race hygiene philosophies.
here for more clips.
The Royal Society has also conducted extensive research into
the planet to manipulate its climate, and continually
lobbies the government to divert funding into the area. The
UK government recently published a lengthy report on geoengineering,
drawing heavily on Royal Society research. The report proposed
methods including spraying sulphate aerosols into the stratosphere
to mimic the cooling effect produced by volcanic eruptions,
as well as placing mirrors in space to reflect the Sun's rays
away from the Earth, a technique known as Solar Radiation Management
Mass sterilization, one child policies and a“Planetary
Regime” with the power of life and death were all core
concepts put forth by John P. Holdren, the man now in control
of science policy in the United States, in his co-authored 1977
While you and I may think the notions of sterilization and
depopulation could never be accepted by the public, those very
concepts are now being embraced
and popularized as the way forward for humanity.
Letting these modern day eugenicists mess with the planet would
be like handing Dr. Josef Mengele control of the health care
system. This group have proven themselves as total control freaks,
promoting a brand of bloodthirsty eugenics even more depraved
than anything Hitler proposed in his drive for a super race.
While the BBC notes in its report on The Royal Society that
"The burgeoning human population is acknowledged as one
of the underlying causes of environmental issues such as climate
change, deforestation, depletion of water resources and loss
of biodiversity." the facts tell quite a different story.
There is a fundamental flaw in associating climate change
Populations in developed countries are declining and only in
third world countries are they expanding dramatically. Industrialization
itself levels out population trends, and even despite this world
population models routinely show that the earth's population
will level out at 9 billion in 2050 and slowly decline after
that. "The population of the most developed countries will
remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050,"
a United Nations report.
Once a country industrializes there is an average of a 1.6
child rate per household, so the western world population is
actually in decline. That trend has also been witnessed in areas
of Asia like Japan and South Korea. The UN has stated that the
population will peak at 9 billion and then begin declining.
Since radical environmentalists are pushing to de-industrialize
the world in the face of the so called carbon threat, this will
reverse the trend that naturally lowers the amount of children
people have. If climate change fanatics are allowed to implement
their policies, global population will continue to increase
and overpopulation may become a real problem – another
example of how the global warming hysterics are actually harming
the long term environment of the earth by preventing overpopulated
countries from developing and naturally lowering their birth
Even if you play devils advocate and accept that humans do
cause catastrophic warming and there are too many of
us, and if you can skip past the Nazi eugenics connotations
of population control and depopulation policies, those methods
are fundamentally still not a valid solution to the
perceived climate change threat.
The real solution would be to pour funds into increasing the
standards of living of the cripplingly poor third world, allowing
those countries to industrialize, and seeing the population
figures naturally level out.
Instead, the third world has seen a doubling
in food prices owing to climate change policies
such as turning over huge areas of agricultural land to the
growth of biofuels.
We are being bombarded daily with idiotic notions that the
human race and life itself is a virus that has spread all over
the planet and that we must consider stemming our own progression
to counter it.
Linking environmental policy to depopulation agendas
the door to eugenics and it is no surprise that
through that door have come pouring hordes of elitist filth
just begging to be on the front line of the extermination policy.
The Royal Society's study is to be launched on
"World Population Day", and is due to be completed
by early 2012 - I wonder what conclusion it will reach?
While they peddle their insane proposals, backed by rampant
fearmongering over climate change on behalf of our governments
and the mainstream media, it is we who are charged with saving
the planet and our place on it by exposing their nefarious agenda
of mass depopulation before it is too late.