The Pentagon has said that transcripts of the proceedings
will be made available though they will be edited to remove
information it deems "dangerous to national security"
The truth is that it would simply be too much of a risk
for the government to make the hearings open because it
has become apparent that if they even have custody of
these high value suspects, which is still unclear, many
of them are known to have been used as intelligence assets,
go betweens and possibly as double agents.
Put simply, they know too much.
One such detainee is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
who has been blamed for everything from 9/11 to the WTC
'93 attacks to the murder of Journalist Daniel Pearle.
When he was captured the media reported on it as a possible
CIA and ISI propaganda op, the timing was so convenient,
just as the Iraq war was warming up.
In Fact there are still lingering
doubts over whether or not Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
has been captured AT ALL.
Mohammed was a known CIA asset in the eighties and was
used as a go between during the CIA-funded Afghan "jihad"
against the occupying Soviets.
It is well established that before his mysterious
arrest as the alleged mastermind behind the September
11 plot, Mohammed was granted
a visa to enter the US just six weeks before the terrorist
attacks in Washington and New York.
To date, we have not seen a single picture of any of
the so-called high profile operatives that have allegedly
been arrested. We have never seen Abu Zubaydah, said to
be Osama Bin Laden's Operations Chief, allegedly captured
March 28, 2002, either during his arrest or in captivity.
Contradictory reports at the time countered that Zubaydah
died in the raid.
Both Mohammed and Zubaydah have been dubbed "ghost
detainees".
Last November The London
Guardian reported that the Bush administration decided
not to charge Jose Padilla with planning to detonate a
radioactive "dirty bomb" in a US city because,
according to sources within the government, the evidence
for the dirty bomb scenario had emerged from the torturing
by the CIA of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Abu Zubaydah.
Padilla is a citizen of the US who has been held under
the controversial "Enemy Combatant" status written
into law under the PATRIOT Act. He was also indicted on
lesser charges of supporting terrorism abroad.
The Neocons had used his case as fearmongering of the
continued threat posed by Al Qaeda on American soil.
Now is it just possible that the reason Padilla cannot
be charged with the dirty bomb claims is because defence
lawyers would naturally call for the witness testimonies
of both Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Abu Zubaydah? This
would mean that the CIA would have to reveal their phantom
prisoners to the world, perhaps something that they cannot
do because they never had them in the first instance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let us help you reach a huge audience of potential customers.
Infowars.net is currently
rocketing up the web rankings and is rivaling Infowars.com
and
Prisonplanet.com in terms of hits. This means guaranteed
sales for advertisers. Help support the website and take
advantage of low advertising rates. Click
here for more info.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have previously reported on the many fake terror arrests
including that of Hambali,
the so called most wanted man in Asia and Ramzi
Bin Al-Shibah, the nephew of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed,
who has also been accused as one of the key plotters of
the September 11 attacks, whose capture was reveled as
another public relations ploy.
The most revealing fake arrest was that of the "Al
Qaeda number three man" Abu Faraj Al Libbi, who
turned out to be a pure nobody with a similar name. The
London
Times described him as among the flotsam jetsam of
the organization.
Al Libbi is spelt L I B B I and the real Mr. Al Libby
is spelt L I B B Y – so on the basis of a misspelled
name this flotsam jetsam becomes Al-Qaeda number three,
becomes a justification that the war on terror is real
in the first place, becomes justification that Bush is
winning the war on terror and that sacrificing our rights
is working, becomes justification for renewing the Patriot
Act and becomes part of the script they’re working
on for when they capture their friend Osama.
One case that has perhaps shed light on the mystery surrounding
these high value detainees may be that of Bisher Al-Rawi,
evidence surrounding whom suggests that the western intelligence
agencies that funded and created the movement now known
as Al Qaeda are routinely using its members as double
agents.
Bisher Al-Rawi claims he was in
the employ of MI5. Al-Rawi was arrested and moved
to Gitmo in November 2002, with his brother, Wahab, while
on a business trip to Gambia, in west Africa, to set up
a peanut-oil processing plant.
He is accused of harbouring the Jordanian cleric Abu
Qatada, described as Osama bin Laden's representative
in Europe, in London, and also transporting the components
of a "weapon of mass destruction". He says he
was being used by MI5 to monitor extremists in Britain's
Muslim community, including Abu Qatada. The "mass
destruction" equipment, say his lawyers, was a battery
charger. Al-Rawi has passed a polygraph test and the British
Government will not comment on his claims.
This information is not new and has been known since
at least 2005 when the British media reported on it. The
London Independent reported on Al-Rawi on July 5 2006,
indicating that British intelligence have a history of
using so called Al Qaeda operatives as informants, allowing
them to be left alone as a trade off. It was MI5 who gave
the CIA information on Al-Rawi that led to his arrest.
There are countless other cases similar to that of Al-Rawi
indicating that the use of "Al Qaeda" go betweens
by the intelligence services is commonplace.
