There was a time, not long ago, when daring to question the
official account of 9/11 was risky business. One was almost
guaranteed to be attacked as a "crazy person" or a
"traitor" or a "terrorist sympathizer."
Times have changed. At this point, less
than 20% of the population believes they were given the full
truth regarding 9/11. Logically one might ask: "Why
is that?"
It wasn't for lack of trying that the government
failed in its propaganda campaign. It wasn't for lack of
"helping hands" in the mainstream media. (Though even
that support has begun to fall apart.) No, it was one thing
and one thing only that caused hundreds of millions of American
citizens to openly question the official account of 9/11; the
evidence.
In short, the evidence that we have been shamelessly
lied to regarding the events of 9/11 is irrefutable. There is
an enormous body of circumstantial evidence, there is an enormous
body of physical evidence, and there is an enormous body of
historical evidence. Perhaps most damning (at this point) is
the ongoing cover up itself. -The deliberate attempt to obstruct
an open discussion of the facts. Evidence of that grows
by the hour, but not to worry...
If you want to see how the investigation into
the attacks of 9/11 was obstructed at every turn; simply watch
9/11
Press for Truth.
If you want to learn the history of government
sponsored "false
flag" terrorism, simply watch Terrorstorm.
If you want to see the evidence of controlled
demolition (all of which has been completely ignored by the
mainstream media and government talking heads) check out September
11 Revisited, or this segment of 911
Mysteries, or this segment from Rise
of the Police State.
If you want to know what an absolute fraud the
"investigation" we finally got was, you can get started
with just a handful of issues. Like:
1. One of the most damning pieces of physical
evidence regarding the events of 9/11 (the collapse of WTC
7) wasn't even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.
How could any report claiming to provide "the fullest
possible account" of the events of 9/11 ignore the unexpected
free-fall
collapse of a 47 story office tower? Is it because, to
this day, nobody can explain how it fell? Is it because it
wasn't struck by any planes or burned with any jet fuel
(the magic formula that supposedly brought down the twin towers?)
Is it because pools of molten metal remained in its basement
for weeks and partially evaporated steel beams were found
in its wreckage? (It is physically impossible for burning
office materials and diesel fuel to liquefy structural steel;
let alone evaporate it into a gas.) How did "The Commission"
deal with these smoking gun issues that clearly contradict
the official account? Simple; they ignored them.
2. How about those towers? You know, the two
110 story buildings constructed with an outer shell of perimeter
columns and an ENORMOUS inner array of core columns that supported
the buildings' vertical loads. Of those towers, the commission
report claimed "exterior walls bore most
of the weight of the building. The interior core
of the buildings was a hollow steel shaft."
This
is an inexcusable inaccuracy that any "investigator"
with an Internet connection and 5 minutes can easily prove
wrong. And it should be noted; any claim or "theory"
of how the towers collapsed based on this erroneous "hollow
shaft" model is fatally flawed. Who in their right mind
can take an "official report" like this seriously?
If they got something this simple wrong, what else did they
miss?
3. Lets not forget "The Commission"
said there was "no credible evidence that any person
in the United States gave the hijackers substantial financial
assistance. Similarly, we have seen no evidence that any foreign
government-or foreign government official-supplied any funding."
Hmm, interesting. How about the Pakistani ISI chief who wired
$100,000 to the alleged "lead hijacker" Mohamed
Atta? Indian
intelligence has verified this. And there has been no
evidence to refute it. Is that worth looking into? -And how
about Sibel Edmonds? Why was she ignored and then gagged under
the veil of "National Security." Better
yet, how about we just have her testify in open hearings about
"money trails" and where they lead to in our government?
And if all this isn't enough, maybe the few
remaining skeptics would like to hear from some Senior Military,
Intelligence, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials who
question the validity of the 9/11 Commission Report. No problem.
Start here.
-So it's true. Times have changed
and the people (for good reason) no longer believe the lies
they've been fed about 9/11. We've woken up to the level
of corruption in our government and the official lie (by all
practical means of determination) is in critical condition and
not expected to recover.
This can only mean one thing. An Independent
investigation into the attacks of 9/11 WILL BE conducted. And
this time, it isn't going to be handful of citizens asking
questions and demanding answers; it's going to be 80% of
the country. And this time, you won't so easily ignore and
whitewash the sensitive issues, because an educated citizenry
is not so easily fooled. And this time, those who have stonewalled,
lied, manipulated, covered up and acted in a criminally negligent
manner will be held accountable for their actions.
To those in power who've forgotten the reality
of their position in government, YOU SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF
THE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Once again, you're
on notice to stop ignoring our demands for a new investigation.
This issue isn't going to go away, and your refusal to address
it will cost you dearly.
And to those of you with something to hide; perhaps now would
be a good time to "lawyer up" and "cut a deal."
The game is over.
