Terror attacks are more likely to occur on anniversaries
of earlier attacks. Everyone agrees about that. The Oklahoma
City bombing of April 19 occurred exactly two years after
the Branch Davidian conflagration in Waco. The Bali bombing
of Oct. 12, 2002 occurred exactly two years after the attack
on the USS Cole.
In the summer of 2007, the Bush administration claimed to
have broken up a terror plot to blow up several airplanes
simultaneously as they flew from the UK to the US -- on 9/11.
They regularly tell us that another terror attack, probably
much worse than 9/11, is not just a matter of if, but when.
Lately they've been more vociferous than usual.
(Article continues below)
The fourth anniversary of the March 11, 2004 Madrid bombings
is two days away, and the fifth anniversary of the March 19,
2003 Iraq invasion is next week. Does the Bush administration
know more than we do about where and when another terror strike
might occur, and who might be behind it?
Conspiracy Coding
"The date of the attack, the 11th, may be only a coincidence,
but it won't be ignored as investigators try to figure out
who was behind today's deadly commuter train attacks in India.
The 11th has now been chosen as an attack date in New York,
Madrid and Mumbai." — Brian Ross, ABC News
With the words above, spoken on the same day as the Mumbai
attacks, ABC's Brian Ross came as close as anybody in mainstream
media ever came to revealing what no one in the power elite
wants to talk about: the date code connecting the terror attacks
that have justified the global war and the Homeland state.
As Ross noted, the number "11" figures prominently
in the 9/11 attack on New York, the 3/11 attack on Madrid
and the 7/11 attack on Mumbai. He easily could have gone further
with his 11-based analysis. The attacks on London occurred
on 7/7 — read "77," a multiple of Mumbai's
7/11 —"7 x 11." The attack on Amman, Jordan
occurred on 11/9 — which is 9/11 backwards.
The numbers add up to a coded conspiracy, whether you believe
it's a conspiracy of "Al Qaeda" or of "Al CIA-duh."
To a cryptanalyst (code-breaker), the only nonsensical explanation
is that it's all just a coincidence. The odds against all
five major international terror strikes since the year 2000
being rooted in the number 11, with four out of five of them
containing the number 11, are astronomical.
Purposeful Perpetrators
"Good morning. At this moment, somewhere in the world,
terrorists are planning new attacks on our country. Their
goal is to bring destruction to our shores that will make
September the 11th pale by comparison." — George
W. Bush
Every one of the attacks worked against Muslim interest,
and in favor of the global war partners trying to wrest control
of the Mideast from them. A by-the-numbers review clarifies
the point:
9/11 — The Big Bang that started it all, 9/11 was "the
new Pearl Harbor" that Bush geo-strategists were writing
about and hoping for before the 2000 elections. Without 9/11,
there could not have been a global war or a Homeland state.
3/11 —"The European 9/11" occurred just days
before the Spanish elections, and at first analysts thought
that it would jolt Spain to the right. Since the Spanish left
wanted to pull out of Iraq, 3/11 was an attempt to keep a
major partner in the global war.
7/7 —"The British 9/11" occurred on the eve
of a contentious G-8 summit in Scotland, thereby distracting
attention away from the inevitable protesters. It cemented
UK commitment to the global war and helped it copycat the
Homeland state.
11/9 — "The Jordanian 9/11" killed key members
of Palestinian intelligence attending a wedding, prompted
King Abdullah to oust his cabinet and resulted in a pro-Western
tilt. 11/9 was a de facto coup d'état of Jordan in
favor of the global war, and it secured the Israeli flank
for its upcoming war against Lebanon.
7/11 —"The Indian 9/11" occurred the day
before Israel's attack on Lebanon, and went far in assuring
that world opinion turned against "Islamic terrorists,"
on whom the attacks were blamed, rather than in favor of the
Islamic population of soon-to-be-blitzed Beirut. 7/11 was
a heavily coded event, with 7 train bombs in 11 minutes, and
the code was so apparent that American media had to "stay
in front" of the story with Brian Ross's ABC News report.
Mainstream Misinformation
"You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call
girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month." —
CIA operative’s comment, reported by Philip Graham,
Washington Post
Mainstream media apologists would argue that ABC's broadcast
of the date code story discredits skeptics like me who believe
that there is little difference between ABC and the NSA, CNN
and the CIA or FOX and the FBI. After all, they would suggest,
how could anyone argue that ABC was trying to cover up the
very story that ABC was reporting?
Let ABC prove the case against itself.
Slowly read the headline and link to the ABC News story:
How to thwart a web search for:
"New York, 9/ll; Madrid, 3/11; Mumbai, 7/ll"
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/07/new_york_9ll_ma.html
Pat yourself on the back if you picked up the three errors
that sabotaged the headline and link:
New York, 9/ll; Madrid, 3/11; Mumbai, 7/ll
One: In the headline two of the three date codes do not contain
11's -- instead, the New York and Mumbai dates contain a double
"L." Compare "9/ll" with "9/11"
and "7/ll" with "7/11."
Two: "3/11" is written correctly in the headline,
probably to make sure that those of us who always type "ll"
instead of "11" would also fail to find the story.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/07/new_york_9ll_ma.html
Three: The link also contains "9/ll" instead of
"9/11."
All this clever sleight of hand was used so that ABC and
the mainstream media, if accused of failing to report on the
terror coding, could insist:
"ABC covered and published the story, and judging by
exceedingly small number of people reading it on the Internet,
no one seems to care very much about it."
Every word of their distortion would be true. The inconvenient
truth that they covered up the references used to find their
story would go unsaid. The case is made. Not only is there
a conspiracy code, but there is a quite clear code of silence
proving that mainstream media is in on the conspiracy.
Beware the Odds of March!
"A terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event (might
cause) our population to question our own Constitution and
to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat
of another mass, casualty- producing event." -- General
Tommy Franks
Having written all this about the terror date code, I should
note that its value as a predictive tool is limited. There
are many 11-based odd-numbered date code possibilities in
the calendar, and my experience is that it is a useful tool
only when taken in conjunction with other indicators. In the
absence of other indicators it would be presumptive to issue
a terror warning, let alone make a specific prediction.
Last week, my record in issuing warnings and predictions
prompted The Lone Star Iconoclast, the influential Texas weekly,
to publish an editorial demanding an official investigation
of my repeated success in anticipating petrochemical explosions
in Southeast Texas. I used my knowledge of the terror date
code in every case.
Time To Investigate Houston Is Now
http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=2525&z=226
In my opinion, the odds are in favor of an uneventful March,
although there are enough dangerous indicators to merit a
false flag warning:
One: General Gene Renuart, the Northcom commander, appeared
before Congress last week and gave assurances that Northcom
is ready for a WMD terror attack on the United States. Is
this a veiled way of saying that Northcom is ready to carry
out such an attack? The general's mind may have been on March
11 and the Madrid bombing anniversary when he said of Al Qaeda:
"We need only to look at Spain and see that they're certainly
willing to try to do something that is significant..."
Two: The military exercise, Cyber Storm II, is scheduled
for this week. It pits thousands of personnel worldwide in
a "practice war" against the Internet. Anglo/English
countries worldwide — Orwell's Oceania — will
be involved, including Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the
UK and the US. As many analysts have noted, the Internet is
the single biggest obstacle to false flag terror, and a practice
war against it could easily "go live" and become
an outright war.
Three: On March 11, NASA will launch Space Shuttle Endeavour.
Two of the petrochemical events I successfully anticipated
occurred within days of space shuttle launches. In both cases
I had factored the NASA launches into my analysis.
* * * * * * *
Captain May is a former Army military intelligence and public
affairs officer, as well as a former NBC editorial writer.
His political and military analyses have appeared in The Wall
Street Journal, The Houston Chronicle and Military Intelligence
Magazine. For a more detailed analysis of the terror date
code, refer to his article, written shortly after the 7/11,
2006 Mumbai attacks, 9/11, 3/11, 7/11 Terror Dates
http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=318&z=44
