-----------------
INFOWARS E-MAIL

User:
Pass:


-----------------

-----------------

-----------------

Rumsfeld Is Sacrificed, But Who Pushed Him Into The Flames?
All Early Reports suggested he would not go quietly, Was he set up to go weeks ago?

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Wednesday, November 8, 2006

Despite early reports all indicating that Donald Rumsfeld would not be forced out of office over the election thumping, he has this afternoon "stepped down" by mutual consent.

"Now after a series of thoughtful conversations, Secretary Rumsfeld and I agreed that the time had come for new leadership at the Pentagon," Bush said in an East Room press conference.

All indications suggest that, like Colin Powell after the 2004 election, Rumsfeld did not go quietly and was in fact pushed out of the door, offered up as a sacrificial lamb as it were in an attempt to re-arrange the deck chairs to steam valve a discontented electorate.

At 8:07 a.m. this morning the AP put out a report titled Rumsfeld spokesman says the defense chief gives no indication he will leave early. Eric Ruff, the Pentagon press secretary, said he participated in meetings with Rumsfeld on Wednesday morning and heard no talk of changing war strategies or of Rumsfeld leaving his post. He said he did not know whether Rumsfeld had talked to President Bush about his future in light of the election results.

As little as two hours before the announcement came, Neocon mouthpiece Fox News was carrying a story headlined Rumsfeld Has No Plans to Step Down, Despite Democrat Gains. The headline has subsequently been changed to Donald Rumsfeld Resigning as Defense Secretary. Below is a google screenshot of the headline.

Just last week Bush made it clear that he had full faith in Rumsfeld and that he would not be resigning no matter the outcome of the election, despite the fact that all military news publications had called for him to be fired.

Rather than squashing speculation about Rumsfeld's future, it has been speculated that Bush's strong and timely statement of support set the stage for the defense secretary to depart without appearing to have been pushed.

"Appearances in Washington are often the precise opposite of what is actually transpiring," said Loren Thompson, a Lexington Institute defense analyst with close ties to the military. "In this case, a vote of confidence from the president may make it easier for Rumsfeld to depart."

Soon to be House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, it seems, also played a part in Rumsfeld's axing.

This morning Pelosi had a "brief meeting" with the President in which they presumably agreed that Rumsfeld would be exited:

Pelosi said in her brief conversation with President Bush on Wednesday morning, they talked about "their wish to work in a bipartisan way" for the American people. "And I think nowhere is that more necessary than with the problem in Iraq," she added. Pressed by another reporter on Iraq, Pelosi said President Bush must "signal a change of direction." She said one good place to start would be to "change the civilian leadership at the Pentagon" - get rid of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, in other words.

Pelosi is already on the record as saying that no impeachment proceedings against President Bush, whether it be for deliberately lying a nation into war or being complicit in 9/11, will take place.

"Impeachment is off the table....it's a pledge....it is a waste of time," Pelosi told 60 Minutes recently. Have we already seen "their wish to work in a bipartisan way" in action today with the outright firing of Rumsfeld?

The Washington Post earlier reported that Senior and former officials close to Rumsfeld said he would not be driven out by Democrats throwing their weight around in Congress. He has repeatedly said he would not quit, and defense officials say criticism makes Rumsfeld dig in his heels.

"He's not resigning," said one of those officials. "He's best when he's criticized."

The Post also reported in the same article:

"The Democrats' victory in the House of Representatives almost certainly ensures investigations into the Pentagon's management of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Some Democratic strategists and congressional staff predict Rumsfeld will be not around for the grilling."

In other words we have already witnessed Pelosi letting the first Neocon clean off the hook. Whilst Democrats will laud the action as an immediate swing of the axe, in reality Rumsfeld has got away with a light bottom spanking. No doubt he can now scuttle off to serve his days out on the board of multiple defense contractors and rake in the profits from the killing spree he has overseen in Iraq.

The ongoing trial of Saddam Hussein and the investigation of his gassing of the Kurdish people, with weapons that Rumsfeld personally delivered to him, also makes this a timely point for Rumsfeld to make an exit. As does the fact that Rumsfeld sold North Korea the means to go nuclear.

Rumsfeld's legacy will be one of a man who ceaselessly spewed war propaganda, sent Iraq into total bedlam and got off scott free. With the Democrats now at the Helm in Congress and Joining in with the "Power and Perversion", as John Stewart so succinctly put it, order out of chaos can be offered as the solution.

The electorate has once again witnessed the Hegelian Dialectic system of the elite power faction of America in operation. They create the problem, they garner the reaction and they offer up the solution and complete their long term agenda.

|

 


Email

--------------------------------------------------------------

INFOWARS: BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND



INFOWARS.net          Copyright © 2001-2006 Alex Jones          All rights reserved.