9/11 family member and "Jersey Girl" Patty Casazza
has just revealed that whistleblowers told her that -- before
9/11 -- the government knew the exact day, the type of attack,
and the targets.
Why is this important? Because, previously, some of the best-known
whistleblowers have been willing to give only vague information
about the government's foreknowledge. For example, they said only
that the government knew of the general timeframe for the attacks,
or that the government had a list of potential targets, on which
the World Trade Center was one of many potential targets (of course,
other whistleblowers have been more specific).
Casazza further stated that these whistleblowers saw how Sibel
Edmonds was being harrassed and gagged, and were fearful that
the same thing would happen to them. So they approached the Jersey
Girls to ask them to demand the 9/11 Commission subpoena the whistleblowers.
The Jersey Girls tried to bring the whistleblowers before the
9/11 Commission, and the Commissioners agreed, but then never
let the whistleblowers testify, let alone subpoena them.
(Article continues below)
Why is this important? Because defenders of the official government
story have argued that 9/11 couldn't have been an inside job or
else whistleblowers would have come forward. Ms. Cassaza confirms
what many have said: there are a lot of 9/11 whistleblowers who
are afraid to come forward -- especially without a supboena --
for fear of being attacked and harassed.
A video of Ms. Cassaza's statement has just been released:
Many whistleblowers have, in fact, already come forward. See
for example this
video. And for a more comprehensive refutation of the argument
about a lack of whistleblowers, see
this.
Thanks to Jon Gold for his key participation in the conference,
and for the tip.
