-----------------
Account Management
-----------------


 

Driver may not have been drunk

Charles Miranda
The Courier-Mail
Sunday October 07, 2007

EVIDENCE that Diana's driver at the time of her death was drunk may have been fabricated as significant discrepancies were found in tests conducted on his body, a London court was told late yesterday.

It has long been held Henri Paul was drunk when he got behind the wheel and sped through the Paris underpass and misjudged the road.

But the High Court inquest into Diana's death has heard there was differing evidence and "discrepancies" in the official findings and witness statements on the 41-year-old driver.

"There is a major issue over whether or not he was unfit to drive through drink or drugs but also whether evidence has been fabricated or made up to suggest that he was drunk when, in truth, he was not," the coroner Lord Justice Scott Baker said.

(Article continues below)

"You may conclude that there are some unsatisfactory features about aspects of the sampling and recording procedures. Some of the results are puzzling."

One issue is a high reading of carbon monoxide found in one blood sample taken from Paul. Such a level would have rendered a person unable to function yet witnesses never reported the French driver appearing unwell.

The coroner instructed the jury to consider whether the sample was contaminated or the sample could have come from elsewhere and not the driver.

The jury also heard one claim that Paul – whose parents were in court yesterday – was paid by M16 to report on the movements of the pair. A wad of cash was found in his pocket at the time of the crash.

Agents for the British secret service were in Paris at the time of the crash but were involved in a counter-terrorism operation and not tracking Diana or her millionaire boyfriend Dodi Fayed, the court has been told

Dodi's father Mohamed Al-Fayed has alleged the agents were in Paris to co-ordinate the assassination of the pair at the behest of the Duke of Edinburgh who feared a potential marriage would humiliate the royals.

But Lord Justice Baker revealed: "Their role consisted of liaison work with the French authorities in respect of such matters as counter terrorism.

"In other words, it is claimed they had other and bigger fish to fry. They were not concerned with the movements of dignitaries."

Email This Page to:
INFOWARS: BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND


INFOWARS.net          Copyright © 2001-2007 Alex Jones          All rights reserved.