|
UK Green Lights Iran Strike
Brown gives backing to Bush for
tactical strikes as "counter-terrorism"
|
|
|
Reports in the British press this weekend have suggested that
Gordon Brown's government has promised to back U.S. led strikes
on Iranian military bases but not on the country's nuclear facilities.
A report in the London
Telegraph citing senior Pentagon officials indicates
that Britain will support an attack if the Islamic republic orchestrates
large-scale attacks by militants against British or American forces
in Iraq:
After talks with President George W Bush in July,
Mr Brown left US officials with the belief that Britain was
"on board" for a military response — but only
if Iran was proved to be behind a big militant attack or another
stunt similar to the kidnapping in March of British sailors.
The US wants Britain's Special Air Service Regiment
to take part in special forces raids inside Iran and has requested
help from the Royal Navy to combat Iranian retaliation in the
Gulf.
A follow
up report in the Telegraph today suggests that the
Neocon Whitehouse has abandoned plans to take out Iran's nuclear
capabilities and will instead use "terrorism" as the
justification to bomb the country.
(Article continues below)
"What's on the table right now is tactical strikes,"
Vincent Cannistraro, intelligence chief on Ronald Reagan's National
Security Council and erstwhile head of operations for the CIA's
counter-terrorist center, told the Telegraph's Tim Shipman.
"The British Government is in accord with plans to launch
limited strikes on facilities inside Iran, on the basis of counter-terrorism."
While the US Air Force and naval jets could carry out raids without
help from the RAF, the Pentagon is keen to have the Royal Navy's
cooperation in the event of an attack, to prevent Iran from sowing
mines in the Gulf to block oil exports in retaliation," he
added.
According to the reports a Downing Street spokesman said: "While
we won't comment on the specifics of conversations between the
Prime Minister and the President of the United States, this is
not a version of events we recognise."
However, the reports dovetail with recent analysis
by the veteran journalist Seymour Hersh, who revealed that his
sources told him U.S. commanders had been drawing up plans to
target Iran's nuclear facilities but were told this summer to
focus instead on the Revolutionary guards, who have been blamed
for attacks on U.S. and British forces in Iraq.
The recent decision by Congress to classify the
Iranian guard as a "terrorist organization" also clears
the way for a British backed counter-terrorist strike.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALEX
JONES' ENDGAME will be released on the WEB OCT. 26
and on DVD on NOV. 1
View High Quality Trailers at www.endgamethemovie.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zbigniew Brzezinski, founder of the elite Trilateral
Commission and the national security adviser to former President
Carter, plainly laid out the theatre that is planned to unfold
in coming months when he said last week that the Bush plan was
to depict any air strike on Iran as "responding to what is
an intolerable situation. This time, unlike the attack in Iraq,
we're going to play the victim."
Brzezinski, along with other elite figures such
as Gary Hart of the Council on foreign relations, have also implied
that a false flag terrorist event, either within the U.S. or Iraq
could be used as justification to launch immediate strikes on
Iran.
Clearly the Neocons realise that the public is not
going to accept a fresh confrontation with Iran based on a different
set of circumstances and so has shifted its rhetoric from the
nuclear issue back to the so called "war on terror"
and is attempting to tie Iran in with the insurgency in Iraq despite
any convincing intelligence.
The fact that the justification for any attack on
Iran keeps changing, just as it did with Iraq before and after
the 2003 invasion, clearly indicates that the only thing that
matters to the Neocon globalists running the Whitehouse is that
they get their conflict escalation and are able to march on unimpeded
and conquer another financially independent and sovereign state
in the middle east.
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
|