|
Ultra Elitist Environmental Group Forced To Admit Doubts
On Global Warming Science
Admits to turning off "knowledgeable people"
with aggressive agenda on warming
|
|
|
 Ultra
elitist environmental group The Royal Society has conceded that
it has "uncertainties" over the science behind global
warming, and admits that the planet is currently no longer heating
up - a development that constitutes another significant blow
to the idea that there is a scientific consensus on the matter.
The
Royal Society's guide, now titled ‘Climate change: a summary
of the science’, has been altered following
complaints from 43 of its own members that "knowledgeable
people" were seeing through brazenly alarmist rhetoric.
The previous Royal Society guides, called "Climate
Change Controversies" and "A guide to facts and fictions
about climate change", produced in 2007 and 2005 respectively,
were extremely heavy frightening, yet completely unfounded,
future climate projections and calls for government to implement
radical measures to prevent them from becoming reality.
The revised Royal Society guide (PDF
here) refrains from pushing scare mongering scenarios
of significantly rising sea levels and soaring temperatures,
as it previously did.
Instead it now reads, "It is not possible
to determine exactly how much the Earth will warm or exactly
how the climate will change in the future, but careful estimates
of potential changes and associated uncertainties have been
made."
"Scientists continue to work to narrow these
areas of uncertainty. Uncertainty can work both ways, since
the changes and their impacts may be either smaller or larger
than those projected." the guide continues.
"The previous guidance was discouraging debate
rather than encouraging it among knowledgeable people. The new
guidance is clearer and a very much better document." Royal
Society member Professor Anthony Kelly told the Daily
Mail in an interview.
The guide also notes:
"There is currently insufficient understanding
of the enhanced melting and retreat of the ice sheets on Greenland
and West Antarctica to predict exactly how much the rate of
sea level rise will increase above that observed in the past
century for a given temperature increase."
"Similarly, the possibility of large changes in the circulation
of the North Atlantic Ocean cannot be assessed with confidence.
The latter limits the ability to predict with confidence what
changes in climate will occur in Western Europe." it concludes.
The guide also states that the warming trend observed predominantly
throughout the 1980s and 90s stopped over a decade ago, an admission
that has been forced following repeated exposure by warming
skeptics, and that was also recently noted
by Professor Phil Jones, the figure at the head
of the Climategate scandal.
"The former publication gave the misleading
impression that the 'science is settled'" Benny Peiser,
Director of The Global Warming Policy Foundation, a group skeptical
of anthropogenic global warming,
"The new guide accepts that important questions
remain open and uncertainties unresolved." Peiser added.
However, The Royal Society clearly still wholeheartedly embraces
the notion that human activity is altering the climate, even
if it does couch it in less brazen rhetoric:
"There is very strong evidence to indicate that climate
change has occurred on a wide range of different timescales
from decades to many millions of years; human activity is a
relatively recent addition to the list of potential causes of
climate change." the guide states.
The development is still a very significant one
however, given that The Royal Society, a 350 year old establishment
outfit, has traditionally been the most vocal proponent for
the hypothesis of AGW.
It was the former president of The Royal Society,
Lord May, who made the infamous statement "The debate on
climate change is over."
When he was head of the Society, May told government
advisors: "On one hand, you have the entire scientific
community and on the other you have a handful of people, half
of them crackpots."
The Royal Society has thrown its full weight behind
the global warming movement, lending its absolute support for
legislation aimed at reducing carbon emissions by 80%, a process
that will devastate the global economy and drastically reduce
living standards everywhere.
It has been even more vehement than national governments in
its advocacy of the man-made cause of global warming, calling
for such drastic CO2 cuts to be made in the short term, not
even by the usual target date of 2050.
Not surprising then that The Royal Society was also intimately
tied to efforts to Whitewash the Climategate emails scandal.
The society has also conducted
extensive research into geoengineering the planet,
and continually lobbies the government to divert funding into
it. A recently published lengthy UK Government report drew
heavily upon the Society's research and concluded
that a global body such as the UN should be appointed to exclusively
regulate world wide geoengineering of the planet in order to
stave off man made global warming.
This information becomes even more disturbing when you consider
the mindset of those who make up the membership of the Society.
It is riddled with renowned eco-fascists, open eugenicists and
depopulation fanatics.
One notable member is James
Lovelock, an eco-fascist who advocates ending democracy
and instituting an authoritative elite to oversee global climate
management and a radical stemming of the human population in
order to combat climate change. He is also a patron
of the Optimum
Population Trust, a notorious UK-based public policy
group that campaigns for a gradual decline in the global human
population, which it refers to as "primates" or "animals",
to what it sees as a “sustainable” level.
Lovelock is also an ardent
advocate of geoengineering. In 2007 Lovelock proposed
laying vast swathes of pipes under the world’s oceans
in order to pump water from the bottom of the seas – rich
in nutrients, but mostly dead – to the top. The idea being
that the action would encourage algae to breed, absorb more
carbon and release more dimethyl sulphide into the atmosphere,
a chemical known to seed sunlight reflecting clouds. Such methods
are also covered in the Commons report.
Another member is Jonathon Porritt, former chair of the UK
Sustainable Development Commission, one of former Prime Minister
Gordon Brown’s leading green advisers, who has stated
that Britain’s
population must be cut in half from around 60 million
to 30 million if it is to build a sustainable society.
Porritt, also a member of the Optimum Population
Trust, a connection that caused raised eyebrows when it was
announced that Porritt was to be a part of a forthcoming Royal
Society “Objective”
Global Population Study.
Also on the Royal
Society's working group for their global population
study is another of their patrons, and another OPT member, BBC
darling wildlife broadcaster and film-maker Sir David Attenborough.
Attenborough has called
for a one child policy like that of Communist China
to be implemented in Britain. The proposal is one of the OPT's
main initiatives. Again, how is this man's influence
going to result in an "objective" study on population?
Another member of that working group is Cambridge economist
Sir Partha Dasgupta, also a fellow of the OPT.
Professor
Malcolm Potts, another member of the working group
was the first male doctor at the Marie Stopes Abortion Clinic
in London, he also advised on the UK's 1967 Abortion Act.
Marie
Stopes was a prominent campaigner for the implementation of
eugenics policies. In Radiant Motherhood (1920)
she called for the "sterilisation of those totally unfit
for parenthood [to] be made an immediate possibility, indeed
made compulsory." That group, according to her, included
non-whites and the poor.
Stopes, an anti-Semite Nazi sympathizer, campaigned for selective
breeding to achieve racial purity, a passion she shared with
Adolf Hitler in adoring letters and poems that she sent the
leader of the Third Reich.
Stopes also attended the Nazi congress on population science
in Berlin in 1935, while calling for the “compulsory sterilization
of the diseased, drunkards, or simply those of bad character.”
Stopes acted on her appalling theories by concentrating her
abortion clinics in poor areas so as to reduce the birth rate
of the lower classes.
Stopes left most of her estate to the Eugenics Society, an
organization that shared her passion for racial purity and still
exists today under the new name The
Galton Institute. The society has included members
such as Charles Galton Darwin (grandson of the evolutionist),
Julian Huxley and Margaret Sanger.
Perhaps most notably, the head of the Royal Society's new study,
John Sulston, most famously played a leading role in the
Human
Genome Project, the effort to identify and map
the thousands of genes of the human genome. Sulston worked under
James D. Watson, a notorious eugenicist who has previously argued
that black people are inherently less intelligent than whites
and has advocated the creation of a "super-race" of
humans, where the attractive and physically strong are genetically
manufactured under laboratory conditions. Watson is also affiliated
with the Royal Society, indeed, in 1993 he received the society's
Copley Medal of honour for "outstanding achievements in
research in any branch of science, and alternates between the
physical sciences and the biological sciences".
Sulston is also a leading advocate of the renowned Atheist
group, The British Humanist Association.
It is clear that this organisation and these people are immersed
in the science of eugenics, and that they have continued the
science under the guise of environmentalism. They hate humanity
and any notion that their studies will represent anything other
than an establishment avocation of mass depopulation is farcical.
It is imperative that the media, places of education, government
representatives and the wider public are made aware of these
facts.
The fact that The Royal Society has been forced to backtrack
and tone down it's rhetoric on global warming highlights that
their agenda is being successfully exposed.
Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons
——————————————————————
Steve Watson is the London based writer
and editor at Alex Jones' Infowars.net, and regular contributor
to Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International
Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham
in England.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alex
Jones LIVE, A Fourth Hour Of Streaming TV Now Added To The Infowars
Radio Show
Click here to get your subscription today!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
|
